Re: Status and future of 3rd party ABI compatibility layer

To: tech-kern%NetBSD.org@localhost
Subject: Re: Status and future of 3rd party ABI compatibility layer
From: Marc Balmer <mbalmer%NetBSD.org@localhost>
Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 17:02:51 +0200

Am 23.03.11 16:06, schrieb Joerg Sonnenberger:
> Hi all,
> the following is what I consider as summary of the thread.
> 
> Use cases mentioned for or considered simple enough:
> - Linux
> - FreeBSD
> - OSF1
> - Ultrix
> - SVR/SVR4
> 
> Incomplete, broken and of questionable use:
> - Darwin and Mach
> - IRIX
> 
> Outdated and not spoken up for:
> - Windows/PECOFF
> 
> As such, I want to propose moving the last two categories into the Attic
> for further dusting.

fwiw, fine by me.

References:
- Status and future of 3rd party ABI compatibility layer
  - From: Joerg Sonnenberger
- Re: Status and future of 3rd party ABI compatibility layer
  - From: Joerg Sonnenberger

Prev by Date: re: high sys time, very very slow builds on new 24-core system
Next by Date: sysmon_pswitch_event(): provide a sleep routine when powerd(8) is not running
Previous by Thread: Re: Status and future of 3rd party ABI compatibility layer
Next by Thread: Re: Status and future of 3rd party ABI compatibility layer
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index