Time | Subject | # followups | From |
Tue, 26 Apr 2011 |
10:57 |
Re: ata(4) and NCQ |
(2) |
Manuel Bouyer |
10:36 |
Re: raidframe problem after upgrade |
(0) |
Manuel Bouyer |
10:00 |
re: raidframe problem after upgrade |
(2) |
matthew green |
08:51 |
make devmon report attach events again |
(0) |
Vladimir Kirillov |
08:30 |
Re: raidframe problem after upgrade |
(1) |
Manuel Bouyer |
Mon, 25 Apr 2011 |
20:45 |
Re: raidframe problem after upgrade |
(1) |
Michael van Elst |
20:09 |
raidframe problem after upgrade |
(1) |
Manuel Bouyer |
01:54 |
Re: ffs fsync patch - block devices and wapbl |
(0) |
YAMAMOTO Takashi |
Sun, 24 Apr 2011 |
05:09 |
very strange and severe raidframe performance issu |
(1) |
matthew green |
Sat, 23 Apr 2011 |
08:40 |
Re: ffs snapshots patch |
(0) |
Juergen Hannken-Illjes |
Fri, 22 Apr 2011 |
20:02 |
Re: vnodes and hard links |
(0) |
Frank Zerangue |
Thu, 21 Apr 2011 |
08:22 |
Re: ffs fsync patch - block devices and wapbl |
(1) |
Juergen Hannken-Illjes |
Wed, 20 Apr 2011 |
13:59 |
Re: GNU vs C99 extern inline |
(0) |
Mindaugas Rasiukevicius |
13:53 |
Re: GNU vs C99 extern inline |
(0) |
Mindaugas Rasiukevicius |
12:40 |
Re: ata(4) and NCQ |
(1) |
Andriy Gapon |
10:07 |
Re: ata(4) and NCQ |
(1) |
Jonathan Stone |
08:09 |
Re: vnodes and hard links |
(1) |
David Holland |
06:23 |
Re: GNU vs C99 extern inline |
(1) |
Iain Hibbert |
01:22 |
Re: kmem-pool-uvm |
(2) |
YAMAMOTO Takashi |
Tue, 19 Apr 2011 |
23:44 |
Re: ffs fsync patch - block devices and wapbl |
(1) |
YAMAMOTO Takashi |
20:13 |
Re: ata(4) and NCQ |
(1) |
Thor Lancelot Simon |
19:58 |
ata(4) and NCQ |
(2) |
Jonathan A. Kollasch |
18:45 |
Re: ffs fsync patch - block devices and wapbl |
(0) |
Jonathan A. Kollasch |
18:36 |
vnodes and hard links |
(1) |
Frank Zerangue |
15:35 |
Re: GNU vs C99 extern inline |
(0) |
Joerg Sonnenberger |
15:10 |
Re: GNU vs C99 extern inline |
(2) |
David Young |
09:38 |
ffs fsync patch - block devices and wapbl |
(2) |
Juergen Hannken-Illjes |
04:46 |
Boost extra energy and extra length! |
(0) |
snys |
Mon, 18 Apr 2011 |
20:39 |
Re: New boothowto flag to prevent raid auto-root-c |
(0) |
Martin Husemann |
17:33 |
Re: New boothowto flag to prevent raid auto-root-c |
(1) |
Brian Buhrow |
15:21 |
Re: New boothowto flag to prevent raid auto-root-c |
(1) |
Izumi Tsutsui |
15:07 |
Re: New boothowto flag to prevent raid auto-root-c |
(0) |
Greg Oster |
15:06 |
Re: New boothowto flag to prevent raid auto-root-c |
(0) |
Martin Husemann |
14:18 |
Re: New boothowto flag to prevent raid auto-root-c |
(1) |
Martin Husemann |
14:06 |
Re: New boothowto flag to prevent raid auto-root-c |
(1) |
Izumi Tsutsui |
11:18 |
Re: New boothowto flag to prevent raid auto-root-c |
(1) |
Martin Husemann |
11:06 |
Re: New boothowto flag to prevent raid auto-root-c |
(2) |
Klaus . Heinz |
08:51 |
re: New boothowto flag to prevent raid auto-root-c |
(0) |
matthew green |
08:17 |
Re: New boothowto flag to prevent raid auto-root-c |
(1) |
tsugutomo . enami |
07:36 |
Re: ffs snapshots patch |
(1) |
Juergen Hannken-Illjes |
07:12 |
Re: How to investigate ENOBUFS? |
(0) |
Michael van Elst |
05:41 |
New boothowto flag to prevent raid auto-root-confi |
(2) |
Martin Husemann |
04:18 |
How to investigate ENOBUFS? |
(1) |
Emmanuel Dreyfus |
Sun, 17 Apr 2011 |
10:59 |
Re: GNU vs C99 extern inline |
(0) |
Iain Hibbert |
00:33 |
Re: GNU vs C99 extern inline |
(2) |
Joerg Sonnenberger |
Sat, 16 Apr 2011 |
20:27 |
GNU vs C99 extern inline |
(2) |
Iain Hibbert |
19:29 |
ffs snapshots patch |
(2) |
Manuel Bouyer |
Fri, 15 Apr 2011 |
09:51 |
Re: kmem-pool-uvm |
(1) |
Lars Heidieker |
Thu, 14 Apr 2011 |
07:05 |
Re: kmem-pool-uvm |
(1) |
YAMAMOTO Takashi |
Mon, 11 Apr 2011 |
10:31 |
NLM (NFS Lock Manager) premature TCP close |
(0) |
Edgar Fuß |
Sun, 10 Apr 2011 |
19:51 |
Re: kmem-pool-uvm |
(0) |
Lars Heidieker |
10:43 |
Re: another wapbl and shapshot issue |
(0) |
Manuel Bouyer |
08:17 |
Re: another wapbl and shapshot issue |
(1) |
Juergen Hannken-Illjes |
02:24 |
Re: kmem-pool-uvm |
(1) |
Mindaugas Rasiukevicius |
Sat, 09 Apr 2011 |
17:45 |
Re: vmem problems [was: Re: extent-patch and overv |
(0) |
David Young |
10:35 |
Re: vmem problems [was: Re: extent-patch and overv |
(0) |
Lars Heidieker |
10:25 |
Re: vmem problems [was: Re: extent-patch and overv |
(1) |
Lars Heidieker |
03:09 |
vmem problems [was: Re: extent-patch and overview |
(2) |
Mindaugas Rasiukevicius |
02:22 |
re: [patch] PCI memory & i/o enables |
(0) |
matthew green |
Fri, 08 Apr 2011 |
22:06 |
Re: extent-patch and overview of what is supposed |
(0) |
Eric Haszlakiewicz |
19:52 |
Re: [patch] PCI memory & i/o enables |
(0) |
Matthias Drochner |
19:48 |
Re: [patch] PCI memory & i/o enables |
(0) |
David Young |
19:28 |
Re: [patch] PCI memory & i/o enables |
(1) |
Eduardo Horvath |
19:13 |
Re: [patch] PCI memory & i/o enables |
(2) |
David Young |
19:08 |
Re: [patch] PCI memory & i/o enables |
(0) |
David Young |
18:48 |
Re: [patch] PCI memory & i/o enables |
(1) |
Matthias Drochner |
18:43 |
Re: [patch] PCI memory & i/o enables |
(0) |
Lars Heidieker |
18:38 |
Re: [patch] PCI memory & i/o enables |
(2) |
Eduardo Horvath |
18:25 |
[patch] PCI memory & i/o enables |
(3) |
David Young |
18:07 |
kmem-pool-uvm |
(2) |
Lars Heidieker |
17:44 |
Re: RAIDframe component replacement |
(0) |
Brian Buhrow |
16:51 |
Re: RAIDframe component replacement |
(0) |
Edgar Fuß |
13:18 |
Re: RAIDframe component replacement |
(0) |
Julian Coleman |
13:08 |
Re: RAIDframe component replacement |
(1) |
Edgar Fuß |
13:01 |
Re: RAIDframe component replacement |
(2) |
Julian Coleman |
12:47 |
Re: RAIDframe component replacement |
(0) |
der Mouse |
12:41 |
Re: RAIDframe component replacement |
(1) |
der Mouse |
08:52 |
Re: RAIDframe component replacement |
(1) |
Edgar Fuß |
08:51 |
Re: RAIDframe component replacement |
(0) |
Manuel Bouyer |
08:48 |
Re: RAIDframe component replacement |
(2) |
Edgar Fuß |
08:48 |
another wapbl and shapshot issue |
(1) |
Manuel Bouyer |
Thu, 07 Apr 2011 |
17:10 |
Re: RAIDframe component replacement |
(0) |
der Mouse |
16:54 |
Re: RAIDframe component replacement |
(1) |
Edgar Fuß |
16:25 |
Re: RAIDframe component replacement |
(2) |
der Mouse |
15:49 |
Re: RAIDframe component replacement |
(1) |
Brian Buhrow |
15:27 |
RAIDframe component replacement |
(1) |
Edgar Fuß |
14:00 |
Re: GSoC 2011 project proposal [Add kqueue support |
(0) |
Dmitry Matveev |
06:24 |
Re: GSoC proposal: NetBSD Kernel Documentation Man |
(0) |
Jukka Ruohonen |
04:45 |
Re: GSoC proposal: NetBSD Kernel Documentation Man |
(0) |
der Mouse |
02:10 |
Re: GSoC proposal: NetBSD Kernel Documentation Man |
(1) |
Thor Lancelot Simon |
00:49 |
Re: diff: add show proc command to ddb |
(0) |
Andrew Doran |
00:09 |
Re: diff: add show proc command to ddb |
(0) |
Vladimir Kirillov |
Wed, 06 Apr 2011 |
23:50 |
Re: GSoC proposal: NetBSD Kernel Documentation Man |
(1) |
Kristaps Dzonsons |
23:18 |
Re: GSoC proposal: NetBSD Kernel Documentation Man |
(0) |
Eduardo Horvath |
23:16 |
Re: GSoC proposal: NetBSD Kernel Documentation Man |
(0) |
Vladimir Kirillov |
23:14 |
Re: GSoC proposal: NetBSD Kernel Documentation Man |
(1) |
Vladimir Kirillov |
22:36 |
Re: GSoC proposal: NetBSD Kernel Documentation Man |
(1) |
Joerg Sonnenberger |
22:24 |
Re: diff: add show proc command to ddb |
(0) |
Vladimir Kirillov |
22:12 |
Re: GSoC proposal: NetBSD Kernel Documentation Man |
(2) |
Vladimir Kirillov |
16:53 |
Re: extent-patch and overview of what is supposed |
(0) |
Manuel Bouyer |
16:43 |
Re: extent-patch and overview of what is supposed |
(2) |
Thor Lancelot Simon |
16:40 |
Re: extent-patch and overview of what is supposed |
(0) |
Thor Lancelot Simon |
16:34 |
Re: extent-patch and overview of what is supposed |
(1) |
Manuel Bouyer |
16:29 |
Re: extent-patch and overview of what is supposed |
(1) |
Mindaugas Rasiukevicius |
16:24 |
Re: extent-patch and overview of what is supposed |
(1) |
Manuel Bouyer |
16:14 |
Re: extent-patch and overview of what is supposed |
(1) |
Thor Lancelot Simon |
16:06 |
Re: extent-patch and overview of what is supposed |
(2) |
Manuel Bouyer |
16:02 |
Re: extent-patch and overview of what is supposed |
(0) |
Thor Lancelot Simon |
15:55 |
Re: extent-patch and overview of what is supposed |
(0) |
Mindaugas Rasiukevicius |
15:53 |
Re: extent-patch and overview of what is supposed |
(1) |
Lars Heidieker |
15:51 |
Re: extent-patch and overview of what is supposed |
(0) |
Manuel Bouyer |
15:45 |
Re: diff: add show proc command to ddb |
(2) |
Eduardo Horvath |
15:44 |
Re: extent-patch and overview of what is supposed |
(0) |
Mindaugas Rasiukevicius |
15:39 |
Re: extent-patch and overview of what is supposed |
(3) |
Mindaugas Rasiukevicius |
15:28 |
Re: GSoC proposal: NetBSD Kernel Documentation Man |
(1) |
Kristaps Dzonsons |
15:04 |
Re: diff: ddb: gather common code for x86 |
(0) |
Vladimir Kirillov |
13:32 |
re: diff: ddb: gather common code for x86 |
(1) |
matthew green |
13:06 |
Re: diff: add show proc command to ddb |
(0) |
Martin Husemann |
13:06 |
Re: diff: ddb: gather common code for x86 |
(0) |
Christoph Egger |
13:03 |
re: diff: add show proc command to ddb |
(2) |
matthew green |
12:59 |
Re: diff: ddb: gather common code for x86 |
(0) |
haad |
12:53 |
diff: exit crash(8) on ^D |
(0) |
Vladimir Kirillov |
12:52 |
diff: crash(8) on amd64 |
(0) |
Vladimir Kirillov |
12:11 |
diff: ddb: gather common code for x86 |
(3) |
Vladimir Kirillov |
07:21 |
Re: diff: add show proc command to ddb |
(1) |
Martin Husemann |
03:01 |
Re: "covering set" of PCI kernels? |
(0) |
David Young |
00:34 |
Re: extent-patch and overview of what is supposed |
(1) |
Brett Lymn |
Tue, 05 Apr 2011 |
23:11 |
diff: add show proc command to ddb |
(2) |
Vladimir Kirillov |
21:27 |
Re: GSoC 2011 project proposal [Add kqueue support |
(1) |
Julio Merino |
21:13 |
Re: GSoC 2011 project proposal [Add kqueue support |
(0) |
Julio Merino |
16:16 |
Re: GSoC 2011 project proposal [Add kqueue support |
(0) |
Mindaugas Rasiukevicius |
16:07 |
GSoC proposal: NetBSD Kernel Documentation Managem |
(3) |
Vladimir Kirillov |
10:10 |
Re: extent-patch and overview of what is supposed |
(0) |
Manuel Bouyer |
09:55 |
Re: extent-patch and overview of what is supposed |
(1) |
Lars Heidieker |
09:43 |
Re: extent-patch and overview of what is supposed |
(1) |
Manuel Bouyer |
09:40 |
Re: extent-patch and overview of what is supposed |
(1) |
Manuel Bouyer |
09:37 |
Re: extent-patch and overview of what is supposed |
(2) |
Mindaugas Rasiukevicius |
09:26 |
Re: extent-patch and overview of what is supposed |
(1) |
Lars Heidieker |
08:45 |
Re: extent-patch and overview of what is supposed |
(2) |
Manuel Bouyer |
06:58 |
Re: pg->offset and pg->flags |
(0) |
Masao Uebayashi |
05:58 |
re: extent-patch and overview of what is supposed |
(0) |
matthew green |
05:32 |
Re: extent-patch and overview of what is supposed |
(2) |
Lars Heidieker |
05:20 |
re: filesystem writing inodes when it oughtn't? |
(0) |
matthew green |
Mon, 04 Apr 2011 |
14:17 |
Re: pg->offset and pg->flags |
(1) |
Andrew Doran |
08:35 |
Re: kernel bitreverse function |
(0) |
Frank Wille |
00:05 |
Re: GSoC 2011 project proposal [Add kqueue support |
(1) |
Jean-Yves Migeon |
Sun, 03 Apr 2011 |
23:08 |
re: pg->offset and pg->flags |
(1) |
matthew green |
21:10 |
Re: GSoC 2011 project proposal [Add kqueue support |
(1) |
Mindaugas Rasiukevicius |
20:27 |
Re: extent-patch and overview of what is supposed |
(1) |
Lars Heidieker |
16:17 |
Re: kernel bitreverse function |
(1) |
Jukka Ruohonen |
16:12 |
Re: kernel bitreverse function |
(1) |
Frank Wille |
15:28 |
Re: kernel bitreverse function |
(0) |
Jukka Ruohonen |
15:10 |
Re: kernel bitreverse function |
(1) |
Frank Wille |
13:42 |
Re: kernel bitreverse function |
(0) |
der Mouse |
12:52 |
Re: extent-patch and overview of what is supposed |
(1) |
Manuel Bouyer |
12:36 |
Re: extent-patch and overview of what is supposed |
(1) |
Lars Heidieker |
12:17 |
Re: kernel bitreverse function |
(0) |
David Laight |
11:43 |
Re: kernel bitreverse function |
(1) |
Frank Wille |
11:35 |
Re: GSoC 2011 project proposal [Add kqueue support |
(2) |
Dmitry Matveev |
10:15 |
Re: pg->offset and pg->flags |
(1) |
David Laight |
10:13 |
Re: kernel bitreverse function |
(1) |
David Laight |
09:35 |
re: pg->offset and pg->flags |
(1) |
matthew green |
Sat, 02 Apr 2011 |
23:36 |
Re: extent-patch and overview of what is supposed |
(1) |
Matthew Mondor |
21:31 |
Re: kernel bitreverse function |
(1) |
Joerg Sonnenberger |
21:11 |
kernel bitreverse function |
(1) |
Frank Wille |
17:38 |
Re: Crazy idea #1: uvm_fpageqlock |
(0) |
David Laight |
13:15 |
pg->offset and pg->flags |
(1) |
Andrew Doran |
13:10 |
Crazy idea #1: uvm_fpageqlock |
(1) |
Andrew Doran |
11:03 |
Re: extent-patch and overview of what is supposed |
(0) |
Lars Heidieker |
09:49 |
Re: extent-patch and overview of what is supposed |
(1) |
Martin Husemann |
09:42 |
Re: extent-patch and overview of what is supposed |
(0) |
Manuel Bouyer |
09:42 |
Re: lockstat from pathological builds Re: high sys |
(0) |
Andrew Doran |
09:36 |
Re: extent-patch and overview of what is supposed |
(1) |
Lars Heidieker |
09:30 |
Re: extent-patch and overview of what is supposed |
(2) |
Manuel Bouyer |
09:08 |
Re: extent-patch and overview of what is supposed |
(1) |
Lars Heidieker |
08:56 |
Re: extent-patch and overview of what is supposed |
(1) |
Lars Heidieker |
06:06 |
Re: GSoC 2011 project proposal [Add kqueue support |
(0) |
Matthew Mondor |
05:05 |
Re: lockstat from pathological builds Re: high sys |
(1) |
Kevin Bowling |
00:31 |
Re: extent-patch and overview of what is supposed |
(2) |
Mindaugas Rasiukevicius |
Fri, 01 Apr 2011 |
23:30 |
re: extent-patch and overview of what is supposed |
(0) |
matthew green |
23:28 |
re: lockstat from pathological builds Re: high sys |
(1) |
matthew green |
20:48 |
Re: lockstat from pathological builds Re: high sys |
(1) |
Andrew Doran |
19:43 |
Re: Status and future of 3rd party ABI compatibili |
(0) |
Matthew Mondor |
19:24 |
Re: "covering set" of PCI kernels? |
(0) |
Manuel Bouyer |
17:48 |
Re: lockstat from pathological builds Re: high sys |
(2) |
Andrew Doran |
17:05 |
Re: lockstat from pathological builds Re: high sys |
(1) |
Thor Lancelot Simon |
17:03 |
Re: "covering set" of PCI kernels? |
(0) |
Michael |
17:01 |
Re: "covering set" of PCI kernels? |
(0) |
Michael |
17:00 |
Re: "covering set" of PCI kernels? |
(1) |
Eduardo Horvath |
16:54 |
Re: "covering set" of PCI kernels? |
(2) |
David Young |
16:54 |
Re: "covering set" of PCI kernels? |
(1) |
David Young |
15:56 |
Re: filesystem writing inodes when it oughtn't? |
(0) |
Eric Haszlakiewicz |
15:47 |
Re: extent-patch and overview of what is supposed |
(0) |
Allen Briggs |
15:27 |
Re: extent-patch and overview of what is supposed |
(1) |
Christoph Egger |
15:20 |
Re: extent-patch and overview of what is supposed |
(1) |
Manuel Bouyer |
14:43 |
Re: extent-patch and overview of what is supposed |
(3) |
Allen Briggs |
09:20 |
Re: "covering set" of PCI kernels? |
(1) |
Manuel Bouyer |
09:06 |
lockstat from pathological builds Re: high sys tim |
(1) |
Thor Lancelot Simon |
08:22 |
extent-patch and overview of what is supposed to f |
(3) |
Lars Heidieker |
00:59 |
Re: "covering set" of PCI kernels? |
(1) |
Michael |