tech-kern by date

Last updated: Sun Aug 04 15:53:08 2013
Messages in reverse chronological order
Timezone is UTC

Page 1 of 2011/04
[Prev Page] [Newest Page] [Oldest Page] [Next Page]

TimeSubject# followupsFrom
Tue, 26 Apr 2011
10:57 Re: ata(4) and NCQ (2) Manuel Bouyer
10:36 Re: raidframe problem after upgrade (0) Manuel Bouyer
10:00 re: raidframe problem after upgrade (2) matthew green
08:51 make devmon report attach events again (0) Vladimir Kirillov
08:30 Re: raidframe problem after upgrade (1) Manuel Bouyer
Mon, 25 Apr 2011
20:45 Re: raidframe problem after upgrade (1) Michael van Elst
20:09 raidframe problem after upgrade (1) Manuel Bouyer
01:54 Re: ffs fsync patch - block devices and wapbl (0) YAMAMOTO Takashi
Sun, 24 Apr 2011
05:09 very strange and severe raidframe performance issu (1) matthew green
Sat, 23 Apr 2011
08:40 Re: ffs snapshots patch (0) Juergen Hannken-Illjes
Fri, 22 Apr 2011
20:02 Re: vnodes and hard links (0) Frank Zerangue
Thu, 21 Apr 2011
08:22 Re: ffs fsync patch - block devices and wapbl (1) Juergen Hannken-Illjes
Wed, 20 Apr 2011
13:59 Re: GNU vs C99 extern inline (0) Mindaugas Rasiukevicius
13:53 Re: GNU vs C99 extern inline (0) Mindaugas Rasiukevicius
12:40 Re: ata(4) and NCQ (1) Andriy Gapon
10:07 Re: ata(4) and NCQ (1) Jonathan Stone
08:09 Re: vnodes and hard links (1) David Holland
06:23 Re: GNU vs C99 extern inline (1) Iain Hibbert
01:22 Re: kmem-pool-uvm (2) YAMAMOTO Takashi
Tue, 19 Apr 2011
23:44 Re: ffs fsync patch - block devices and wapbl (1) YAMAMOTO Takashi
20:13 Re: ata(4) and NCQ (1) Thor Lancelot Simon
19:58 ata(4) and NCQ (2) Jonathan A. Kollasch
18:45 Re: ffs fsync patch - block devices and wapbl (0) Jonathan A. Kollasch
18:36 vnodes and hard links (1) Frank Zerangue
15:35 Re: GNU vs C99 extern inline (0) Joerg Sonnenberger
15:10 Re: GNU vs C99 extern inline (2) David Young
09:38 ffs fsync patch - block devices and wapbl (2) Juergen Hannken-Illjes
04:46 Boost extra energy and extra length! (0) snys
Mon, 18 Apr 2011
20:39 Re: New boothowto flag to prevent raid auto-root-c (0) Martin Husemann
17:33 Re: New boothowto flag to prevent raid auto-root-c (1) Brian Buhrow
15:21 Re: New boothowto flag to prevent raid auto-root-c (1) Izumi Tsutsui
15:07 Re: New boothowto flag to prevent raid auto-root-c (0) Greg Oster
15:06 Re: New boothowto flag to prevent raid auto-root-c (0) Martin Husemann
14:18 Re: New boothowto flag to prevent raid auto-root-c (1) Martin Husemann
14:06 Re: New boothowto flag to prevent raid auto-root-c (1) Izumi Tsutsui
11:18 Re: New boothowto flag to prevent raid auto-root-c (1) Martin Husemann
11:06 Re: New boothowto flag to prevent raid auto-root-c (2) Klaus . Heinz
08:51 re: New boothowto flag to prevent raid auto-root-c (0) matthew green
08:17 Re: New boothowto flag to prevent raid auto-root-c (1) tsugutomo . enami
07:36 Re: ffs snapshots patch (1) Juergen Hannken-Illjes
07:12 Re: How to investigate ENOBUFS? (0) Michael van Elst
05:41 New boothowto flag to prevent raid auto-root-confi (2) Martin Husemann
04:18 How to investigate ENOBUFS? (1) Emmanuel Dreyfus
Sun, 17 Apr 2011
10:59 Re: GNU vs C99 extern inline (0) Iain Hibbert
00:33 Re: GNU vs C99 extern inline (2) Joerg Sonnenberger
Sat, 16 Apr 2011
20:27 GNU vs C99 extern inline (2) Iain Hibbert
19:29 ffs snapshots patch (2) Manuel Bouyer
Fri, 15 Apr 2011
09:51 Re: kmem-pool-uvm (1) Lars Heidieker
Thu, 14 Apr 2011
07:05 Re: kmem-pool-uvm (1) YAMAMOTO Takashi
Mon, 11 Apr 2011
10:31 NLM (NFS Lock Manager) premature TCP close (0) Edgar Fuß
Sun, 10 Apr 2011
19:51 Re: kmem-pool-uvm (0) Lars Heidieker
10:43 Re: another wapbl and shapshot issue (0) Manuel Bouyer
08:17 Re: another wapbl and shapshot issue (1) Juergen Hannken-Illjes
02:24 Re: kmem-pool-uvm (1) Mindaugas Rasiukevicius
Sat, 09 Apr 2011
17:45 Re: vmem problems [was: Re: extent-patch and overv (0) David Young
10:35 Re: vmem problems [was: Re: extent-patch and overv (0) Lars Heidieker
10:25 Re: vmem problems [was: Re: extent-patch and overv (1) Lars Heidieker
03:09 vmem problems [was: Re: extent-patch and overview (2) Mindaugas Rasiukevicius
02:22 re: [patch] PCI memory & i/o enables (0) matthew green
Fri, 08 Apr 2011
22:06 Re: extent-patch and overview of what is supposed (0) Eric Haszlakiewicz
19:52 Re: [patch] PCI memory & i/o enables (0) Matthias Drochner
19:48 Re: [patch] PCI memory & i/o enables (0) David Young
19:28 Re: [patch] PCI memory & i/o enables (1) Eduardo Horvath
19:13 Re: [patch] PCI memory & i/o enables (2) David Young
19:08 Re: [patch] PCI memory & i/o enables (0) David Young
18:48 Re: [patch] PCI memory & i/o enables (1) Matthias Drochner
18:43 Re: [patch] PCI memory & i/o enables (0) Lars Heidieker
18:38 Re: [patch] PCI memory & i/o enables (2) Eduardo Horvath
18:25 [patch] PCI memory & i/o enables (3) David Young
18:07 kmem-pool-uvm (2) Lars Heidieker
17:44 Re: RAIDframe component replacement (0) Brian Buhrow
16:51 Re: RAIDframe component replacement (0) Edgar Fuß
13:18 Re: RAIDframe component replacement (0) Julian Coleman
13:08 Re: RAIDframe component replacement (1) Edgar Fuß
13:01 Re: RAIDframe component replacement (2) Julian Coleman
12:47 Re: RAIDframe component replacement (0) der Mouse
12:41 Re: RAIDframe component replacement (1) der Mouse
08:52 Re: RAIDframe component replacement (1) Edgar Fuß
08:51 Re: RAIDframe component replacement (0) Manuel Bouyer
08:48 Re: RAIDframe component replacement (2) Edgar Fuß
08:48 another wapbl and shapshot issue (1) Manuel Bouyer
Thu, 07 Apr 2011
17:10 Re: RAIDframe component replacement (0) der Mouse
16:54 Re: RAIDframe component replacement (1) Edgar Fuß
16:25 Re: RAIDframe component replacement (2) der Mouse
15:49 Re: RAIDframe component replacement (1) Brian Buhrow
15:27 RAIDframe component replacement (1) Edgar Fuß
14:00 Re: GSoC 2011 project proposal [Add kqueue support (0) Dmitry Matveev
06:24 Re: GSoC proposal: NetBSD Kernel Documentation Man (0) Jukka Ruohonen
04:45 Re: GSoC proposal: NetBSD Kernel Documentation Man (0) der Mouse
02:10 Re: GSoC proposal: NetBSD Kernel Documentation Man (1) Thor Lancelot Simon
00:49 Re: diff: add show proc command to ddb (0) Andrew Doran
00:09 Re: diff: add show proc command to ddb (0) Vladimir Kirillov
Wed, 06 Apr 2011
23:50 Re: GSoC proposal: NetBSD Kernel Documentation Man (1) Kristaps Dzonsons
23:18 Re: GSoC proposal: NetBSD Kernel Documentation Man (0) Eduardo Horvath
23:16 Re: GSoC proposal: NetBSD Kernel Documentation Man (0) Vladimir Kirillov
23:14 Re: GSoC proposal: NetBSD Kernel Documentation Man (1) Vladimir Kirillov
22:36 Re: GSoC proposal: NetBSD Kernel Documentation Man (1) Joerg Sonnenberger
22:24 Re: diff: add show proc command to ddb (0) Vladimir Kirillov
22:12 Re: GSoC proposal: NetBSD Kernel Documentation Man (2) Vladimir Kirillov
16:53 Re: extent-patch and overview of what is supposed (0) Manuel Bouyer
16:43 Re: extent-patch and overview of what is supposed (2) Thor Lancelot Simon
16:40 Re: extent-patch and overview of what is supposed (0) Thor Lancelot Simon
16:34 Re: extent-patch and overview of what is supposed (1) Manuel Bouyer
16:29 Re: extent-patch and overview of what is supposed (1) Mindaugas Rasiukevicius
16:24 Re: extent-patch and overview of what is supposed (1) Manuel Bouyer
16:14 Re: extent-patch and overview of what is supposed (1) Thor Lancelot Simon
16:06 Re: extent-patch and overview of what is supposed (2) Manuel Bouyer
16:02 Re: extent-patch and overview of what is supposed (0) Thor Lancelot Simon
15:55 Re: extent-patch and overview of what is supposed (0) Mindaugas Rasiukevicius
15:53 Re: extent-patch and overview of what is supposed (1) Lars Heidieker
15:51 Re: extent-patch and overview of what is supposed (0) Manuel Bouyer
15:45 Re: diff: add show proc command to ddb (2) Eduardo Horvath
15:44 Re: extent-patch and overview of what is supposed (0) Mindaugas Rasiukevicius
15:39 Re: extent-patch and overview of what is supposed (3) Mindaugas Rasiukevicius
15:28 Re: GSoC proposal: NetBSD Kernel Documentation Man (1) Kristaps Dzonsons
15:04 Re: diff: ddb: gather common code for x86 (0) Vladimir Kirillov
13:32 re: diff: ddb: gather common code for x86 (1) matthew green
13:06 Re: diff: add show proc command to ddb (0) Martin Husemann
13:06 Re: diff: ddb: gather common code for x86 (0) Christoph Egger
13:03 re: diff: add show proc command to ddb (2) matthew green
12:59 Re: diff: ddb: gather common code for x86 (0) haad
12:53 diff: exit crash(8) on ^D (0) Vladimir Kirillov
12:52 diff: crash(8) on amd64 (0) Vladimir Kirillov
12:11 diff: ddb: gather common code for x86 (3) Vladimir Kirillov
07:21 Re: diff: add show proc command to ddb (1) Martin Husemann
03:01 Re: "covering set" of PCI kernels? (0) David Young
00:34 Re: extent-patch and overview of what is supposed (1) Brett Lymn
Tue, 05 Apr 2011
23:11 diff: add show proc command to ddb (2) Vladimir Kirillov
21:27 Re: GSoC 2011 project proposal [Add kqueue support (1) Julio Merino
21:13 Re: GSoC 2011 project proposal [Add kqueue support (0) Julio Merino
16:16 Re: GSoC 2011 project proposal [Add kqueue support (0) Mindaugas Rasiukevicius
16:07 GSoC proposal: NetBSD Kernel Documentation Managem (3) Vladimir Kirillov
10:10 Re: extent-patch and overview of what is supposed (0) Manuel Bouyer
09:55 Re: extent-patch and overview of what is supposed (1) Lars Heidieker
09:43 Re: extent-patch and overview of what is supposed (1) Manuel Bouyer
09:40 Re: extent-patch and overview of what is supposed (1) Manuel Bouyer
09:37 Re: extent-patch and overview of what is supposed (2) Mindaugas Rasiukevicius
09:26 Re: extent-patch and overview of what is supposed (1) Lars Heidieker
08:45 Re: extent-patch and overview of what is supposed (2) Manuel Bouyer
06:58 Re: pg->offset and pg->flags (0) Masao Uebayashi
05:58 re: extent-patch and overview of what is supposed (0) matthew green
05:32 Re: extent-patch and overview of what is supposed (2) Lars Heidieker
05:20 re: filesystem writing inodes when it oughtn't? (0) matthew green
Mon, 04 Apr 2011
14:17 Re: pg->offset and pg->flags (1) Andrew Doran
08:35 Re: kernel bitreverse function (0) Frank Wille
00:05 Re: GSoC 2011 project proposal [Add kqueue support (1) Jean-Yves Migeon
Sun, 03 Apr 2011
23:08 re: pg->offset and pg->flags (1) matthew green
21:10 Re: GSoC 2011 project proposal [Add kqueue support (1) Mindaugas Rasiukevicius
20:27 Re: extent-patch and overview of what is supposed (1) Lars Heidieker
16:17 Re: kernel bitreverse function (1) Jukka Ruohonen
16:12 Re: kernel bitreverse function (1) Frank Wille
15:28 Re: kernel bitreverse function (0) Jukka Ruohonen
15:10 Re: kernel bitreverse function (1) Frank Wille
13:42 Re: kernel bitreverse function (0) der Mouse
12:52 Re: extent-patch and overview of what is supposed (1) Manuel Bouyer
12:36 Re: extent-patch and overview of what is supposed (1) Lars Heidieker
12:17 Re: kernel bitreverse function (0) David Laight
11:43 Re: kernel bitreverse function (1) Frank Wille
11:35 Re: GSoC 2011 project proposal [Add kqueue support (2) Dmitry Matveev
10:15 Re: pg->offset and pg->flags (1) David Laight
10:13 Re: kernel bitreverse function (1) David Laight
09:35 re: pg->offset and pg->flags (1) matthew green
Sat, 02 Apr 2011
23:36 Re: extent-patch and overview of what is supposed (1) Matthew Mondor
21:31 Re: kernel bitreverse function (1) Joerg Sonnenberger
21:11 kernel bitreverse function (1) Frank Wille
17:38 Re: Crazy idea #1: uvm_fpageqlock (0) David Laight
13:15 pg->offset and pg->flags (1) Andrew Doran
13:10 Crazy idea #1: uvm_fpageqlock (1) Andrew Doran
11:03 Re: extent-patch and overview of what is supposed (0) Lars Heidieker
09:49 Re: extent-patch and overview of what is supposed (1) Martin Husemann
09:42 Re: extent-patch and overview of what is supposed (0) Manuel Bouyer
09:42 Re: lockstat from pathological builds Re: high sys (0) Andrew Doran
09:36 Re: extent-patch and overview of what is supposed (1) Lars Heidieker
09:30 Re: extent-patch and overview of what is supposed (2) Manuel Bouyer
09:08 Re: extent-patch and overview of what is supposed (1) Lars Heidieker
08:56 Re: extent-patch and overview of what is supposed (1) Lars Heidieker
06:06 Re: GSoC 2011 project proposal [Add kqueue support (0) Matthew Mondor
05:05 Re: lockstat from pathological builds Re: high sys (1) Kevin Bowling
00:31 Re: extent-patch and overview of what is supposed (2) Mindaugas Rasiukevicius
Fri, 01 Apr 2011
23:30 re: extent-patch and overview of what is supposed (0) matthew green
23:28 re: lockstat from pathological builds Re: high sys (1) matthew green
20:48 Re: lockstat from pathological builds Re: high sys (1) Andrew Doran
19:43 Re: Status and future of 3rd party ABI compatibili (0) Matthew Mondor
19:24 Re: "covering set" of PCI kernels? (0) Manuel Bouyer
17:48 Re: lockstat from pathological builds Re: high sys (2) Andrew Doran
17:05 Re: lockstat from pathological builds Re: high sys (1) Thor Lancelot Simon
17:03 Re: "covering set" of PCI kernels? (0) Michael
17:01 Re: "covering set" of PCI kernels? (0) Michael
17:00 Re: "covering set" of PCI kernels? (1) Eduardo Horvath
16:54 Re: "covering set" of PCI kernels? (2) David Young
16:54 Re: "covering set" of PCI kernels? (1) David Young
15:56 Re: filesystem writing inodes when it oughtn't? (0) Eric Haszlakiewicz
15:47 Re: extent-patch and overview of what is supposed (0) Allen Briggs
15:27 Re: extent-patch and overview of what is supposed (1) Christoph Egger
15:20 Re: extent-patch and overview of what is supposed (1) Manuel Bouyer
14:43 Re: extent-patch and overview of what is supposed (3) Allen Briggs
09:20 Re: "covering set" of PCI kernels? (1) Manuel Bouyer
09:06 lockstat from pathological builds Re: high sys tim (1) Thor Lancelot Simon
08:22 extent-patch and overview of what is supposed to f (3) Lars Heidieker
00:59 Re: "covering set" of PCI kernels? (1) Michael


Page 1 of 2011/04
[Prev Page] [Newest Page] [Oldest Page] [Next Page]
Home


Mail converted by MHonArc