Re: Removing PF

[Johnny Billquist <bqt%softjar.se@localhost>]

On 2019-04-01 15:17, Jaromír Doleček wrote:
> Le lun. 1 avr. 2019 à 14:32, Stephen Borrill <netbsd%precedence.co.uk@localhost> a écrit :
> > Your two statements are mutually inconsistent:
> > 1) No-one is maintaining ipf or pf
> > and
> > 2) If the effort had been on one firewall instead of three, the one chosen
> > would be more functional.
>
> IMO it's consistent - if we had one, it would be clear to which one to
> contribute, and clear if the feature is really missing and working.
> i.e. nobody contributes anything because they don't know to which of
> the firewalls to contribute.

It is obviously inconsistent. You can't both claim that no-one is 
maintaining it, and claim people putting some effort into it (with "it" 
being either pf or ipf).

  Johnny

--
Johnny Billquist                  || "I'm on a bus
                                  ||  on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt%softjar.se@localhost             ||  Reading murder books
pdp is alive!                     ||  tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol