Re: Removing PF

[Jason Thorpe <thorpej%me.com@localhost>]

> On Apr 1, 2019, at 1:33 PM, Johnny Billquist <bqt%softjar.se@localhost> wrote:
> 
> It is obviously inconsistent. You can't both claim that no-one is maintaining it, and claim people putting some effort into it (with "it" being either pf or ipf).

It is not inconsistent in the sense that if you want to make other changes that touch things that PF uses, you have to spend the time to update PF.

This is most significantly related to networking APIs that the Project wishes to make MP-friendly in a performant way.

-- thorpej