tech-net archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Lockless IP input queue, the pktqueue interface
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 09:56:15PM +1000, Darren Reed wrote:
> >I am surprised... no, more like shocked really... that someone as
> >experienced as you are could think this way.
>
> Yes, experienced. That means I've seen all manner of code written.
>
> And I've never before seen anyone justify a code design decision
> based on who they want or don't want to change code. Especially
> when it is open source code.
...he didn't, you know. You made that up and put the words in his
mouth. He's following standard practices. As you should be aware.
> Similarly I've never seen putting structs in .c files lead anywhere
> useful in the long term.
Really? I find that claim equally surprising. And shocking.
--
David A. Holland
dholland%netbsd.org@localhost
- References:
- Lockless IP input queue, the pktqueue interface
- From: Mindaugas Rasiukevicius
- Re: Lockless IP input queue, the pktqueue interface
- Re: Lockless IP input queue, the pktqueue interface
- From: Mindaugas Rasiukevicius
- Re: Lockless IP input queue, the pktqueue interface
- Re: Lockless IP input queue, the pktqueue interface
- From: Mindaugas Rasiukevicius
- Re: Lockless IP input queue, the pktqueue interface
- Re: Lockless IP input queue, the pktqueue interface
- From: Mindaugas Rasiukevicius
- Re: Lockless IP input queue, the pktqueue interface
- Re: Lockless IP input queue, the pktqueue interface
- Re: Lockless IP input queue, the pktqueue interface
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index