Re: RFC: ipsec(4) pseudo interface

[Kengo NAKAHARA <k-nakahara%iij.ad.jp@localhost>]

Hi,

On 2017/12/19 11:07, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> In article <20171218184400.GA27276%britannica.bec.de@localhost>,
> Joerg Sonnenberger  <joerg%bec.de@localhost> wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 06:49:44PM +0900, Kengo NAKAHARA wrote:
>>>     (a) Add if_ipsec.4
>>>     (b) move current ipsec.4(for ipsec protocol) to ipsec.9, and then
>>>         add ipsec.4(for ipsec pseudo interface)
>>>     (c) any other
>>
>> I'd call it either ifipsec(4) or ipsecif(4).

Thank you for comments. I use ipsecif(4) as it is easy to sort in
alphabetical with ipsec(4). :)

> Traditionally the names of devices drivers and protocols go to section 4.
> So we have a conflict here, use one of the names Joerg suggested and cross
> reference it on the top of the ipsec.4 page:
> 
> .Pp
> This manual pages describes the IPSEC.
> For the network device driver please see
> .Xr ifipsec 4 .

Thank you for your suggestion. I add the reference to ipsec(4).

As a result, here is the updated patch.
    - patch series
      - https://netbsd.org/~knakahara/if_ipsec/if_ipsec2.tgz
        - in paticular, manual is added in 0004-add-ipsec-4-I-F-man-as-ipsecif.4.patch
    - unified patch
      - https://netbsd.org/~knakahara/if_ipsec/if_ipsec2-unified.patch
# include christos@n.o's pointing out


Thanks,

-- 
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Internet Initiative Japan Inc.

Device Engineering Section,
IoT Platform Development Department,
Network Division,
Technology Unit

Kengo NAKAHARA <k-nakahara%iij.ad.jp@localhost>