tech-pkg archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: broken packages for 2012Q3



On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 10:19:00PM +0200, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 01:14:43PM -0700, Jeff Rizzo wrote:
> > On 9/29/12 12:52 PM, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> > >On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 12:48:14PM -0700, Jeff Rizzo wrote:
> > >>But it *is* a big deal, because the package isn't building.  Hence,
> > >>we may not have an easy path to Xen when 6.0 releases.
> > >How does this prevent the package from building ? I installed xen*41 from
> > >pkgsrc-current a few days ago, and I didn't have problems.
> > >
> > 
> > It's failing on all pkgsrc bulk builds since 2012Q2 was cut, so at
> > least there won't be binary pkgs available.  Someone suggested to me
> > to remove PKG_DEVELOPER=yes to work around it, but that doesn't seem
> > to have fixed anything, at least in my builds.
> 
> I don't have this problem. I'll double-check that my pkgsrc is up to date,
> but I guess you still have PKG_DEVELOPER defined somewhere.

I see that the TNF package builders have PKG_DEVELOPER=yes. They should
probably not. AFAIK the goal of these systems is to produce binary packages,
not to debug pkgsrc. Also this may partially explain why they're so slow
building packages.

-- 
Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>
     NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
--


Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index