Re: Why adding unconditional dependency on tradcpp? (Re: CVS commit: pkgsrc/net/tightvnc)

[Jonathan Perkin <jperkin%joyent.com@localhost>]

* On 2013-07-09 at 05:42 BST, OBATA Akio wrote:

> On Wed, 03 Jul 2013 16:25:34 +0900, David Holland 
> <dholland-pkgtech%netbsd.org@localhost> wrote:
> 
> >On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 03:08:30PM +0900, OBATA Akio wrote:
> > > > > And you must maintain tradcpp by yourself, because upstream developers
> > > > > will not take care of missing features for a such local tool.
> > > >
> > > >As opposed to, say, the upstream developers who don't care about
> > > >missing features in clang, which doesn't provide a traditional cpp at
> > > >all?
> > >
> > > If using tradcpp conditionally, not affect to gcc users.
> >
> >Ok, so what broke again? Is there a problem here?
> 
> I don't want to waste any time from it.
> In audio/nas (on NetBSD-5.2-i386):
> 
> mv -f Makefile Makefile.bak
> imake -DUseInstalled -I/usr/pkg/lib/X11/config
> Usage: tradcpp [options] [infile [outfile]]

audio/nas has been broken on SunOS for a few days too now, see bulk
build reports (failure mode is different but possibly related).

-- 
Jonathan Perkin  -  Joyent, Inc.  -  www.joyent.com