tech-pkg archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: pkgsrc frozen for 2017Q2



Am Sat, 1 Jul 2017 14:13:47 -0500
schrieb Jason Bacon <bacon4000%gmail.com@localhost>:

> As we've just ramped up efforts to promote pkgsrc to the HPC community, 
> we need to remove as many hurdles as possible, so those who are curious 
> come away with a good first impression.

Speaking of HPC … I hope all this GCC_REQD business is not relevant
when a compiler is provided from the outside (as my self-built GCCs or
Intel, Pgi compilers … I actually prodded Pgi folks to consider
supplying some definitions so that pkgsrc can use their compiler). Is
this the case?

What happens when I want my native compiler to be used and it is older
than GCC_REQD … will pkgsrc build a newer one itself or abort and
inform me that my config will not work? In our installations, we want
to ensure that our chosen (vendor, whatnot) compiler is being used.

And regarding GCC 4.8 vs GCC 4.9 … yes, 4.8 being shipped with CentOS 7
is a good argument to try to support that as minimum version. I usually
try to build a first set of pkgsrc with the system compiler, later
optimised trees with newer GCC or one of the other compilers.


Alrighty then,

Thomas

-- 
Dr. Thomas Orgis
Universität Hamburg
RRZ / Basis-Infrastruktur / HPC
Schlüterstr. 70
20146 Hamburg
Tel.: 040/42838 8826
Fax: 040/428 38 6270

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature



Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index