tech-toolchain archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

re: Sets, subsets, syspkgs, and MK*

To: Masao Uebayashi <uebayasi%tombi.co.jp@localhost>
Subject: re: Sets, subsets, syspkgs, and MK*
From: matthew green <mrg%eterna.com.au@localhost>
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 12:24:51 +1100

   
   But we're moving toward modularity.  Yes?  No?  I'm not sure all people have
   agreed, but no one has strongly opposed.


i object pretty strenuously against any plans to remove most
of the MK* variables and some of the USE* in our tree.


.mrg

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Sets, subsets, syspkgs, and MK*
  - From: Masao Uebayashi
- Re: Sets, subsets, syspkgs, and MK*
  - From: Bernd Ernesti

References:
- Re: Sets, subsets, syspkgs, and MK*
  - From: Masao Uebayashi

Prev by Date: Re: make rule of multiple file generation (was Re: CVS commit: src/share/mk)
Next by Date: Re: Sets, subsets, syspkgs, and MK*
Previous by Thread: Re: Sets, subsets, syspkgs, and MK*
Next by Thread: Re: Sets, subsets, syspkgs, and MK*
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index