tech-toolchain archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Sets, subsets, syspkgs, and MK*
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:24:51PM +1100, matthew green wrote:
>
> But we're moving toward modularity. Yes? No? I'm not sure all people
> have
> agreed, but no one has strongly opposed.
>
>
> i object pretty strenuously against any plans to remove most
> of the MK* variables and some of the USE* in our tree.
For the record: I object too to removed these.
Bernd
- Prev by Date:
re: Sets, subsets, syspkgs, and MK*
- Next by Date:
Re: Sets, subsets, syspkgs, and MK*
- Previous by Thread:
re: Sets, subsets, syspkgs, and MK*
- Next by Thread:
Re: Sets, subsets, syspkgs, and MK*
- Indexes:
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index