tech-toolchain archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Sets, subsets, syspkgs, and MK*
> That's a good use case, but I don't see how you get from there to
> renaming variables.
>
> If the original build is done with all MK/USE at defaults, builds are
> reproducible, and the new build is also done that way, you can generate
> a binary patch. Changing MK/USE seems to me to have nothing to do with
> it.
>
> Perhaps you could post a design for binary patch generation and application.
I've not investigated that far. :)
I feel iTunes auto update annoying. It'd be nicer if I can only update iPhone
F/W. Granularity sometimes matters for end users too.
Masao
--
Masao Uebayashi / Tombi Inc. / Tel: +81-90-9141-4635
- References:
- Re: Sets, subsets, syspkgs, and MK*
- re: Sets, subsets, syspkgs, and MK*
- Re: Sets, subsets, syspkgs, and MK*
- Re: Sets, subsets, syspkgs, and MK*
- Re: Sets, subsets, syspkgs, and MK*
- Re: Sets, subsets, syspkgs, and MK*
- Prev by Date:
Re: Sets, subsets, syspkgs, and MK*
- Next by Date:
Re: Sets, subsets, syspkgs, and MK*
- Previous by Thread:
Re: Sets, subsets, syspkgs, and MK*
- Next by Thread:
Re: Sets, subsets, syspkgs, and MK*
- Indexes:
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index