tech-toolchain archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Sets, subsets, syspkgs, and MK*
> We understand, you don't understand that they do not want to. If
> they have made a change like that, they compiled from source. If they
> compiled from source, they want a source patch, and compile from source
> again. Attempting to supply binary patches to people who have compiled
> from source is absurd - don't even think in that direction.
I understand.
You keep assuming I want to build from source. The opposite.
No one explains *WHY* YP code in libc has to be conditionally built. Who'll
explain that?
Masao
--
Masao Uebayashi / Tombi Inc. / Tel: +81-90-9141-4635
- References:
- Re: Sets, subsets, syspkgs, and MK*
- Re: Sets, subsets, syspkgs, and MK*
- Re: Sets, subsets, syspkgs, and MK*
- Re: Sets, subsets, syspkgs, and MK*
- Prev by Date:
Re: Sets, subsets, syspkgs, and MK*
- Next by Date:
Re: Sets, subsets, syspkgs, and MK*
- Previous by Thread:
Re: Sets, subsets, syspkgs, and MK*
- Next by Thread:
Re: Sets, subsets, syspkgs, and MK*
- Indexes:
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index