tech-toolchain archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: Sets, subsets, syspkgs, and MK*

To: tech-toolchain%NetBSD.org@localhost
Subject: Re: Sets, subsets, syspkgs, and MK*
From: Masao Uebayashi <uebayasi%tombi.co.jp@localhost>
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 01:30:38 +0900

> No one explains *WHY* YP code in libc has to be conditionally built.  Who'll
> explain that?

Greg Troxel agreed that PAM is better than KERBEROS in login, so I hope at
least he shares my interest here. :)

Masao

-- 
Masao Uebayashi / Tombi Inc. / Tel: +81-90-9141-4635

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Sets, subsets, syspkgs, and MK*
  - From: Greg Troxel

References:
- Re: Sets, subsets, syspkgs, and MK*
  - From: Masao Uebayashi
- Re: Sets, subsets, syspkgs, and MK*
  - From: Masao Uebayashi
- Re: Sets, subsets, syspkgs, and MK*
  - From: Izumi Tsutsui
- Re: Sets, subsets, syspkgs, and MK*
  - From: Robert Elz
- Re: Sets, subsets, syspkgs, and MK*
  - From: Masao Uebayashi

Prev by Date: Re: Sets, subsets, syspkgs, and MK*
Next by Date: Re: Sets, subsets, syspkgs, and MK*
Previous by Thread: Re: Sets, subsets, syspkgs, and MK*
Next by Thread: Re: Sets, subsets, syspkgs, and MK*
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index