tech-toolchain archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Sets, subsets, syspkgs, and MK*
Masao Uebayashi <uebayasi%tombi.co.jp@localhost> writes:
>> No one explains *WHY* YP code in libc has to be conditionally built. Who'll
>> explain that?
>
> Greg Troxel agreed that PAM is better than KERBEROS in login, so I hope at
> least he shares my interest here. :)
That's not really what I said.... I said that if you try to avoid
anything like USE_* you end up with loadable modules (essentially
deferring the conditionalization to runtime) and something like pam.
Attachment:
pgp8k4pVVLVhi.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- References:
- Re: Sets, subsets, syspkgs, and MK*
- Re: Sets, subsets, syspkgs, and MK*
- Re: Sets, subsets, syspkgs, and MK*
- Re: Sets, subsets, syspkgs, and MK*
- Re: Sets, subsets, syspkgs, and MK*
- Re: Sets, subsets, syspkgs, and MK*
- Prev by Date:
Re: Sets, subsets, syspkgs, and MK*
- Next by Date:
Re: Sets, subsets, syspkgs, and MK*
- Previous by Thread:
Re: Sets, subsets, syspkgs, and MK*
- Next by Thread:
Re: Sets, subsets, syspkgs, and MK*
- Indexes:
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index