Re: message lang tags verse SSH_MSG_KEXINIT

[Alok Aggarwal <aalok%eng.sun.com@localhost>]

> one possible rationale has occurred to me:
> 
> Even if the peers negotiated that all messages will be in, say,
> martian, the server might not have translations for all possible
> messages, and might need to send some messages in a "default"
> language, in which case it should be tagged as such so it gets

If the server didn't have support for, say, martian, it shouldn't have
negotiated martian as the language with the client in first place. Although 
if it did initially agree on talking in martian then it should be capable of
translating all the messages. Do you have a particular case in mind where
what you are saying would supersede this?

-Alok