Re: SRP in OpenSSH draft protocol spec

[RJ Atkinson <rja%inet.org@localhost>]

At 21:32 02/04/01, Tom Wu wrote:

>But it is precisely the same.  There's still no legally-binding document
>to cite in court, which is presumably what you're objecting to, just a
>clear statement from the inventor on behalf of the organization he did
>the work for.

        ...which I noted earlier I was not comfortable with
most of the IPR statements online at IETF.

>I suppose you didn't notice that the SRP IPR notice was received from
>Stanford, either.  Why the double-standard?

        No double standard.  I really want an RFC from
everyone, which folks who've been around for a while have
seen from me in other WGs in the past (e.g. in IPsec).

Ran