Re: des-cbc cipher

To: Markus Friedl <markus%openbsd.org@localhost>
Subject: Re: des-cbc cipher
From: RJ Atkinson <rja%inet.org@localhost>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 10:41:59 -0500

At 10:29 29/11/01, Markus Friedl wrote:
>but these implementations violate the drafts if they
>use "des-cbc". they must use "des-cbc@domain".

The IETF traditionally does not change a spec after it is deployed
such that existing implementations are gratuitously made non-compliant.
Am I confused ?  Is this WG trying to make existing deployed SSHv2
implementations non-compliant with its current drafts ?  

Ran
rja%inet.org@localhost

Follow-Ups:
- Re: des-cbc cipher
  - From: Bill Sommerfeld
- Re: des-cbc cipher
  - From: Markus Friedl

References:
- Re: des-cbc cipher
  - From: RJ Atkinson
- Re: des-cbc cipher
  - From: RJ Atkinson
- Re: des-cbc cipher
  - From: Darren Moffat
- Re: des-cbc cipher
  - From: Markus Friedl

Prev by Date: Re: des-cbc cipher
Next by Date: Re: des-cbc cipher
Previous by Thread: Re: des-cbc cipher
Next by Thread: Re: des-cbc cipher
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index