works for me. At 01:19 PM 12/11/2001 -0500, Wes Griffin wrote:
> So I think we need to have something, requirements or whatever, > that we whack the DNSEXT wg with, so they know we're thinking > about it, regardless of what 'we' want to do. That is the idea, and what I'm in the process of doing, but for a larger group of applications, not just SSH. I was also told after the meeting, that I could gut the current draft and re-write it to keep the title, which I might infact do and turn it into a requirements document. Is that reasonable?