Re: draft-ietf-secsh-break-01.txt

["Phillip Remaker" <remaker%cisco.com@localhost>]

Did the draft expire?  We can just resubmit it.   All auxillary specs are on
standby until the core drafts are approved.

What the heck is the holdup these days?

Joe, do you want to resubmit it or should I?



> Brian Pence wrote:
> > What was the reason for abandoning this ietf draft?  I've had a couple
of
> > customer's request this functionality, but as it was never formalized as
a
> > standard, I'm not so sure it's a good idea to implement.  It's not even
a
> > working draft any more.  What gives?  What's the plans for this?
>
> Basically, if I remember correctly, we are waiting for the
> the 'core-drafts' hairball to get to RFC status-- I'm not sure
> what the status of this is?????
>
> Once that happens all the other drafts that reference the
> core drafts can move forward.
>
> I suppose we just need to freshen the draft to keep it alive
> while this process drags on.
>
> As far as being formalized as a standard, it is currently
> as formal as any other SSH2 standard-- so if your implementing
> any SSH2, don't hold back :-)
>
> - Joseph
>