Re: draft-ietf-secsh-break-01.txt

[Joseph Galbraith <galb%vandyke.com@localhost>]

I'm not sure I've got the most recent XML--
Can you resubmit it?

Thanks,

Joseph

Phillip Remaker wrote:
> Did the draft expire?  We can just resubmit it.   All auxillary specs are on
> standby until the core drafts are approved.
>
> What the heck is the holdup these days?
>
> Joe, do you want to resubmit it or should I?
>
>
>
>
> > Brian Pence wrote:
> >
> > > What was the reason for abandoning this ietf draft?  I've had a couple
>
> of
>
> > > customer's request this functionality, but as it was never formalized as
>
> a
>
> > > standard, I'm not so sure it's a good idea to implement.  It's not even
>
> a
>
> > > working draft any more.  What gives?  What's the plans for this?
> >
> > Basically, if I remember correctly, we are waiting for the
> > the 'core-drafts' hairball to get to RFC status-- I'm not sure
> > what the status of this is?????
> >
> > Once that happens all the other drafts that reference the
> > core drafts can move forward.
> >
> > I suppose we just need to freshen the draft to keep it alive
> > while this process drags on.
> >
> > As far as being formalized as a standard, it is currently
> > as formal as any other SSH2 standard-- so if your implementing
> > any SSH2, don't hold back :-)
> >
> > - Joseph