On Thursday, September 08, 2005 15:39:18 +0200 Tom Petch <nwnetworks%dial.pipex.com@localhost> wrote:
I see, belatedly, that secsh-arch still has a reference to SNMP and proxy forwarding in it. Since isms has now chosen to pursue SNMP over SSH and since proxy forwarding is a significant feature of SNMP and since, as far as I can establish, the reference in secsh-arch has no relationship to any of this whatsoever, I think that 'SNMP' should be elided from the document before it spreads havoc and confusion (already widespread in and around isms:-(
Given that the SNMP-over-SSH work being done in ISMS currently takes the form of a subsystem rather than a connection-forwarding channel, I'm inclined to agree. Removing the mention of SNMP as an example does not meaningfully change the document, but will likely avoid considerable confusion in the future.
-- Jeff