Re: Eyeballs needed.

To: Tom Petch <nwnetworks%dial.pipex.com@localhost>
Subject: Re: Eyeballs needed.
From: Chris Lonvick <clonvick%cisco.com@localhost>
Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2005 19:09:51 -0700 (PDT)

Hi Tom,

Yes. The diffs (.html files) are between the September drafts and whatthe RFC Editor has changed.


Thanks,
Chris

On Fri, 28 Oct 2005, Tom Petch wrote:

Just to check the obvious, the underlying I-Ds that were given to the RFC Editor
are the ones that came out in September with an updated file name but with the
previous name on the first page eg
file name  draft-ietf-secsh-architecture-23.txt:
title inside draft-ietf-secsh-architecture-22.txt:

Yes?
Tom Petch

References:
- Eyeballs needed.
  - From: Bill Sommerfeld
- Re: Eyeballs needed.
  - From: Tom Petch

Prev by Date: DSA keys larger than 1024 bits
Next by Date: Re: Definition of "packet"
Previous by Thread: Re: Eyeballs needed.
Next by Thread: Re: Eyeballs needed.
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index