On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 12:39:27PM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
Jon> The suggestion seems OK. I'm not sure what word other than
Jon> "blob" we could use. "public key object"? "public key
Jon> representation"? Since we're in IESG evaluation now, I'm not
Jon> sure what the process is for integrating such a change. If I
Jon> can issue another rev, I will (unless someone speaks up
Jon> against it) include this change.
What ended up happening with this? I didn't see the comment because
neither the ietf nor iesg list was copied.
I argued that no change was needed. I don't think there's consensus on
making any change in this regard.