Re: [Ssh] Re: draft charter

[Damien Miller <djm%mindrot.org@localhost>]

I'd prefer an IETF-hosted list for an IETF WG personally.

On Tue, 13 Aug 2024, Jeffrey Hutzelman wrote:

> Hm.  The ietf-ssh%netbsd.org@localhost list was used by the original secsh working
> group and has served as a forum for ongoing (if quite low-volume) discussion
> since then. Why not reuse it, instead of setting up a new list? 
> The scope of a maintenance group like this should include discussion and
> evaluation of proposed extensions and revisions. Of course, actually working
> on any such proposal would require a charter revision, but IMHO it should be
> clear that this group is the right place for such discussions.
> 
> -- Jeff
> 
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2024, 18:38 Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell%cs.tcd.ie@localhost>
> wrote:
> 
>       Thanks Deb,
> 
>       On 13/08/2024 23:24, Deb Cooley wrote:
>       >
>       > Or for more information see here:
>       > https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/sshm/about/
> 
>       As you'll have seen if you went to that web page, Deb
>       and Paul have asked Job Snijders and I to help out doing
>       a bit of chairing whenever this WG is officially setup.
>       We're happy to try help out that way.
> 
>       If anyone has any questions about IETF process or anything
>       else relevant, feel free to just mail the list, or if you
>       prefer, you could send off-list mail to Job and I.
> 
>       Meanwhile, comments on the draft charter, [1] as Deb said,
>       would be good to get in the immediate future. If you think
>       that text is good enough, getting a few "looks good to me"
>       mails sent to the list could also be useful for people
>       involved in approving the formation of the WG.
> 
>       Cheers,
>       S.
> 
>       [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-sshm/
> 
> 
>