Re: Clang++ 3.4 (from new stable branch) doesn't work?

[Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost>]

On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 12:33:24PM +0200, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
> On Saturday April 12 2014 11:44:05 Rhialto wrote:
> 
> > I notice that the latest revisions of the package's Makefile and PLIST
> > comment "Added libc++".
> > http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/pkgsrc/lang/clang/Makefile.diff?r1=1.25&r2=1.26&f=h
> > http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/pkgsrc/lang/clang/PLIST.diff?r1=1.11&r2=1.12&f=h
> 
> Don't forget that it's (neigh) impossible to link programmes to both
> libc++ and libstdc++, so it's probably best to configure clang to use
> whatever C++ runtime is the system default!

This is not true, in fact, libc++ is explicitly written to be able to
co-exist with libstdc++...

Joerg