Re: msgpack-git upgrade question

[Thomas Klausner <wiz%NetBSD.org@localhost>]

On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 06:54:19PM +0530, Mayuresh wrote:
> The upstream packages seem to be tagged separately for c and c++ under the
> same github project msgpack-c. (For other languages they have separate
> projects.)
> 
> https://github.com/msgpack/msgpack-c/tags
> 
> E.g. c-6.1.0, cpp-6.1.1 etc, these are interleaved.
> 
> So keeping in line with the upstream convention, and also pkgsrc's
> existing nomenclature such as php-msgpack, py-msgpack, ruby-msgpack etc.
> should we have have c-msgpack and cpp-msgpack?

It seems to me that the c++ version also includes the c version, so in
this case I'd probably just provide a combined package for both (which
is what I think wip/msgpack-git does now?).
 Thomas