tech-userlevel archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: tn3270, mset and map3270
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 08:17:28AM +0900, ITOH Yasufumi wrote:
> > >> What makes you think that terminfo(5) doesn't allow this also?
> > >
> > > I knew some implementations have extension to allow custom
> > > capabilities, but is not portable.
> >
> > This does not matter.
>
> An interface is what provides compatibility and portability.
Yes. The *interface* is called "curses". How about we hunt down and
kill off all the programs that still use *either* raw termcap or raw
terminfo?
Arguing about which one is better is like debating crossbows vs. muskets.
--
David A. Holland
dholland%netbsd.org@localhost
- References:
- Re: tn3270, mset and map3270
- Re: tn3270, mset and map3270
- Re: tn3270, mset and map3270
- Re: tn3270, mset and map3270
- Re: tn3270, mset and map3270
- Re: tn3270, mset and map3270
- Re: tn3270, mset and map3270
- Re: tn3270, mset and map3270
- Re: tn3270, mset and map3270
- Re: tn3270, mset and map3270
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index