Re: wedge device to name

To: Kamil Rytarowski <n54%gmx.com@localhost>
Subject: Re: wedge device to name
From: Christos Zoulas <christos%zoulas.com@localhost>
Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2019 11:50:58 -0400

Yes, but bolting on extra functionality that belongs to syscalls using sysctl creates a rats
nest for userland in the long term, and it is not exactly cheap to maintain and document 
all the sysctl code. And with versioning you get to kill the old versions if you want, with
sysctl you are left with the mess.

christos

> On Sep 22, 2019, at 11:42 AM, Kamil Rytarowski <n54%gmx.com@localhost> wrote:
> 
> ,

Follow-Ups:
- Re: wedge device to name
  - From: Kamil Rytarowski

References:
- wedge device to name
  - From: Emmanuel Dreyfus
- Re: wedge device to name
  - From: Christos Zoulas
- Re: wedge device to name
  - From: Michael van Elst
- Re: wedge device to name
  - From: Christos Zoulas
- Re: wedge device to name
  - From: Christos Zoulas
- Re: wedge device to name
  - From: Kamil Rytarowski
- Re: wedge device to name
  - From: Christos Zoulas
- Re: wedge device to name
  - From: Kamil Rytarowski

Prev by Date: perl with -Duselongdouble needs more libm support
Next by Date: Re: Leak Sanitizer - how to suppress leaks
Previous by Thread: Re: wedge device to name
Next by Thread: Re: wedge device to name
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index