Re: UVM typedef struct

To: Masao Uebayashi <uebayasi%gmail.com@localhost>
Subject: Re: UVM typedef struct
From: Jason Thorpe <thorpej%shagadelic.org@localhost>
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 17:43:58 -0700


On Jun 15, 2009, at 9:43 PM, Masao Uebayashi wrote:

I think that there're many benefits by making struct vm_page opaque.
Its content is touched from ~everywhere including filesystem layers,
which violates abstraction.  I'd propose to make vm_page_t opaque and
make users to always use accessor routines.


I would like to see NetBSD do that with ~all of its data structures.

-- thorpej

Follow-Ups:
- Re: UVM typedef struct
  - From: David Holland

References:
- UVM typedef struct
  - From: Mindaugas Rasiukevicius
- Re: UVM typedef struct
  - From: Masao Uebayashi

Prev by Date: Re: UVM typedef struct
Next by Date: Re: UVM typedef struct
Previous by Thread: Re: UVM typedef struct
Next by Thread: Re: UVM typedef struct
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index