Re: UVM typedef struct


On Jun 16, 2009, at 12:02 PM, Antti Kantee wrote:

The underlying problem is that I do not see any benefit from arbitrary
typedefs such as struct x -> x_t.  Will we get u32_t next?


No, the real benefit is "x * -> x_t".

-- thorpej

Follow-Ups:
- Re: UVM typedef struct
  - From: Tonnerre LOMBARD
- Re: UVM typedef struct
  - From: David Holland
- Re: UVM typedef struct
  - From: David Laight

References:
- UVM typedef struct
  - From: Mindaugas Rasiukevicius
- Re: UVM typedef struct
  - From: Antti Kantee
- Re: UVM typedef struct
  - From: Mindaugas Rasiukevicius
- Re: UVM typedef struct
  - From: Antti Kantee

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index