tech-kern by date

Last updated: Sun Aug 04 15:53:07 2013
Messages in reverse chronological order
Timezone is UTC

Page 1 of 2009/08
[Prev Page] [Newest Page] [Oldest Page] [Next Page]

TimeSubject# followupsFrom
Tue, 11 Aug 2009
06:45 Re: UVM typedef struct (2) David Holland
06:44 Re: UVM typedef struct (0) David Laight
06:38 Re: UVM typedef struct (0) David Holland
06:30 Re: vfs-level naming issue (0) David Holland
00:48 Re: UVM typedef struct (0) Jason Thorpe
00:43 Re: UVM typedef struct (3) Jason Thorpe
00:41 Re: UVM typedef struct (1) Jason Thorpe
00:40 Re: UVM typedef struct (0) Jason Thorpe
Mon, 10 Aug 2009
21:16 Re: Early console attach vs PCI_NETBSD_CONFIGURE (0) Gavan Fantom
17:42 Re: vfs-level naming issue (1) Adam Hamsik
16:08 vfs-level naming issue (1) David Holland
15:23 Re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives - (0) David Young
15:09 re: swap space leak in 5.0_STABLE (0) matthew green
15:02 Re: swap space leak in 5.0_STABLE (1) Manuel Bouyer
14:43 Re: swap space leak in 5.0_STABLE (1) YAMAMOTO Takashi
14:25 Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical (0) Marc Balmer
13:34 Re: swap space leak in 5.0_STABLE (0) Mark Davies
13:25 Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical (1) Manuel Bouyer
13:23 Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO re (0) Joerg Sonnenberger
13:14 Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO re (1) Manuel Bouyer
13:08 Re: swap space leak in 5.0_STABLE (3) Manuel Bouyer
12:53 Re: swap space leak in 5.0_STABLE (2) Mark Davies
10:13 Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO re (1) Marc Balmer
07:48 Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO re (1) Thor Lancelot Simon
07:41 Re: Reworked: Support for multi-position electro-m (0) Marc Balmer
06:56 Re: what keylock(4) actually does for netbsd? (0) Marc Balmer
06:11 Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical (1) Marc Balmer
Sun, 09 Aug 2009
22:18 re: swap space leak in 5.0_STABLE (1) matthew green
21:54 Re: swap space leak in 5.0_STABLE (1) Mark Davies
21:37 re: swap space leak in 5.0_STABLE (0) matthew green
21:18 Re: swap space leak in 5.0_STABLE (2) Matthew Mondor
21:12 Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO re (0) Tonnerre LOMBARD
21:05 re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives - (1) matthew green
20:55 Re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives - (0) Manuel Bouyer
20:54 Re: sata tape drives? (0) Paul Goyette
20:53 Re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives - (0) Paul Goyette
20:53 Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO re (2) Marc Balmer
20:48 Re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives - (2) David Laight
20:40 Re: [PATCH] pcictl: simplify its usage (0) Manuel Bouyer
20:37 Re: sata tape drives? (1) Manuel Bouyer
20:35 Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO re (0) Christos Zoulas
20:30 re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives - (1) matthew green
20:28 Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical (0) Marc Balmer
20:24 Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical (1) Paul Goyette
20:23 Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical (1) Matt Thomas
20:20 Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical (1) Marc Balmer
20:17 re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical (1) matthew green
20:06 Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical (2) Marc Balmer
20:05 re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical (1) matthew green
20:02 Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical (1) Marc Balmer
20:00 Re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives - (0) Manuel Bouyer
19:59 Re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives - (0) Paul Goyette
19:56 Re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives - (0) Manuel Bouyer
19:50 re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical (1) matthew green
19:47 Re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives - (3) Manuel Bouyer
19:38 Re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives - (1) Manuel Bouyer
19:38 Re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives - (2) David Laight
19:35 Re: sata tape drives? (1) Manuel Bouyer
19:34 re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives - (0) Paul Goyette
19:30 Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO re (0) David Laight
19:29 re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives - (2) matthew green
19:14 Re: Reworked: Support for multi-position electro-m (0) Marc Balmer
19:00 Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO re (0) Marc Balmer
19:00 Re: sata tape drives? (0) Paul Goyette
18:56 Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO re (1) Matt Thomas
18:55 sata tape drives? (2) Bernd Ernesti
18:52 Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO re (1) Manuel Bouyer
18:40 Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO re (0) Marc Balmer
18:38 Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO re (2) Marc Balmer
18:36 Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO re (1) Ted Lemon
18:35 Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO re (1) Manuel Bouyer
18:25 Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO re (2) Marc Balmer
18:19 Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO re (0) Marc Balmer
17:40 Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO re (1) Ted Lemon
17:34 Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO re (2) Adam Hoka
17:34 Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO re (1) Marc Balmer
17:32 Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO re (1) Matt Thomas
17:13 Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO re (1) Marc Balmer
17:11 Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO re (1) Adam Hoka
17:03 Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO re (2) Marc Balmer
15:58 Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO re (0) Thor Lancelot Simon
15:41 Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO re (2) Marc Balmer
15:35 Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO re (1) Thor Lancelot Simon
15:30 Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO re (2) YAMAMOTO Takashi
14:18 Re: gpioiic(4), I2C bus over GPIO bit-banging (0) Marc Balmer
14:04 Re: gpioiic(4), I2C bus over GPIO bit-banging (1) Matthias Scheler
13:25 swap space leak in 5.0_STABLE (2) Mark Davies
12:55 Re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives - (0) Paul Goyette
12:45 Re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives - (0) Paul Goyette
12:22 Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO re (0) Marc Balmer
12:04 Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO re (2) Adam Hamsik
11:39 Re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives - (0) Manuel Bouyer
11:36 Re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives - (3) Manuel Bouyer
10:59 Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO re (2) Marc Balmer
10:14 Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical (0) Marc Balmer
10:01 Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical (1) Marc Balmer
08:28 Re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives - (2) Iain Hibbert
03:01 Re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives - (2) Paul Goyette
Sat, 08 Aug 2009
22:45 Re: gpioiic(4), I2C bus over GPIO bit-banging (0) Tonnerre LOMBARD
22:44 Re: gpioiic(4), I2C bus over GPIO bit-banging (0) Tonnerre LOMBARD
18:28 Re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives (1) Paul Goyette
18:23 Re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives (0) Paul Goyette
17:51 Re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives (0) David Young
17:49 Re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives (2) David Young
16:14 Re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives (1) Paul Goyette
14:07 Re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives (1) Marc Balmer
14:02 Re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives (1) Paul Goyette
13:39 Re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives (1) Marc Balmer
13:33 Re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives (1) Paul Goyette
13:33 Re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives (1) Paul Goyette
13:12 Re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives (1) Marc Balmer
12:36 Re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives (1) Marc Balmer
12:36 Re: gpioiic(4), I2C bus over GPIO bit-banging (3) Marc Balmer
12:28 Re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives (2) Paul Goyette
12:16 Re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives (1) Marc Balmer
12:10 Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives (1) Paul Goyette
10:37 gpioiic(4), I2C bus over GPIO bit-banging (1) Marc Balmer
09:14 Re: [HEADS UP] zfs import (0) Pawel Jakub Dawidek
07:44 CDDL [was: ]Re: [HEADS UP] zfs import (0) Hubert Feyrer
06:26 Re: [HEADS UP] zfs import (0) Adam Hamsik
01:28 Re: [HEADS UP] zfs import (0) Thor Lancelot Simon
Fri, 07 Aug 2009
23:38 Re: [HEADS UP] zfs import (3) Arnaud Lacombe
21:11 [HEADS UP] zfs import (2) Adam Hamsik
18:28 Re: on getting rid of KAUTH_GENERIC_ISSUSER (0) Elad Efrat
18:28 Re: RAIDframe parity logging (0) Thor Lancelot Simon
18:28 RAIDframe parity logging (1) Thor Lancelot Simon
18:28 Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical (0) Peter Seebach
09:41 Lona (0) MR ALONSO FERNANDO
08:14 Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical (1) Marc Balmer
Thu, 06 Aug 2009
16:06 Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical (0) Peter Seebach
15:54 Re: Problems with hangs under NetBSD-5.x (0) Manuel Bouyer
15:42 Re: Problems with hangs under NetBSD-5.x (1) Mindaugas Rasiukevicius
15:28 Re: Problems with hangs under NetBSD-5.x (0) Mindaugas Rasiukevicius
14:50 Re: Problems with hangs under NetBSD-5.x (0) Greg Oster
14:22 Re: Problems with hangs under NetBSD-5.x (0) Manuel Bouyer
14:17 Re: Problems with hangs under NetBSD-5.x (1) Manuel Bouyer
13:38 Re: Reworked: Support for multi-position electro-m (0) Marc Balmer
10:51 Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical (0) Marc Balmer
10:47 Re: the __ namespace in the kernel (0) Antti Kantee
10:47 Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical (1) Anders Magnusson
10:42 Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical (0) Marc Balmer
10:42 Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical (0) Antti Kantee
10:41 Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical (2) Marc Balmer
10:37 Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical (1) Marc Balmer
10:34 Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical (3) Matthias Drochner
08:00 Reworked: Support for multi-position electro-mecha (4) Marc Balmer
07:21 Re: factoring out prop_XXX_pack_pref() and prop_XX (0) Iain Hibbert
07:19 Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical (1) Marc Balmer
Wed, 05 Aug 2009
22:15 Re: factoring out prop_XXX_pack_pref() and prop_XX (1) Christoph Badura
06:44 Re: factoring out prop_XXX_pack_pref() and prop_XX (0) David Laight
06:14 Re: Problems with hangs under NetBSD-5.x (3) Brian Buhrow
02:55 Re: factoring out prop_XXX_pack_pref() and prop_XX (0) David Holland
00:28 Re: factoring out prop_XXX_pack_pref() and prop_XX (3) Jason Thorpe
Tue, 04 Aug 2009
22:07 Re: Problems with hangs under NetBSD-5.x (1) Mark Davies
21:07 Re: [PATCH] pcictl: simplify its usage (1) Matthias Drochner
17:39 Re: Fwd: usb driver programming (0) Iain Hibbert
16:45 Re: Fwd: usb driver programming (1) Dmitry Cherkassov
10:13 Re: Fwd: usb driver programming (1) Iain Hibbert
09:35 Fwd: usb driver programming (1) Dmitry Cherkassov
03:19 Re: Vnode scope implementation (1) Elad Efrat
Mon, 03 Aug 2009
23:07 Re: Vnode scope implementation (1) YAMAMOTO Takashi
16:04 Re: kernel_lock, splbio() and SMP_SAFE (0) Manuel Bouyer
15:58 Re: kernel_lock, splbio() and SMP_SAFE (0) Mindaugas Rasiukevicius
15:58 Re: kernel_lock, splbio() and SMP_SAFE (1) Manuel Bouyer
15:37 Re: kernel_lock, splbio() and SMP_SAFE (1) Mindaugas Rasiukevicius
15:28 Re: kernel_lock, splbio() and SMP_SAFE (1) Manuel Bouyer
14:58 Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical (2) Peter Seebach
14:44 Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical (1) Marc Balmer
14:23 Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical (1) David Holland
11:38 kernel_lock, splbio() and SMP_SAFE (2) Manuel Bouyer
03:45 Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical (1) David Holland
Sun, 02 Aug 2009
19:48 Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical (0) Marc Balmer
19:44 Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical (0) Christoph Badura
19:43 Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical (1) Arnaud Lacombe
19:06 Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical (0) Marc Balmer
19:03 Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical (2) Antti Kantee
18:53 Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical (2) Marc Balmer
18:26 Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical (1) Mindaugas Rasiukevicius
17:46 Re: on getting rid of KAUTH_GENERIC_ISSUSER (1) Iain Hibbert
17:23 Re: Problems with hangs under NetBSD-5.x (0) Manuel Bouyer
16:52 Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical (0) Hubert Feyrer
16:45 Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical (1) Arnaud Lacombe
16:35 Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical (1) Christoph Badura
14:08 Re: roadmap for /kern (0) Tonnerre LOMBARD
09:54 Support for multi-position electro-mechanical keyl (6) Marc Balmer
08:27 Re: roadmap for /kern (0) Marc Balmer
05:50 Re: roadmap for /kern (0) David Holland
05:35 Re: roadmap for /kern (2) Matthew Mondor
04:14 Re: roadmap for /kern (1) Arnaud Lacombe
02:09 roadmap for /kern (2) matthew sporleder
Sat, 01 Aug 2009
23:31 Re: Problems with hangs under NetBSD-5.x (1) Matthew Mondor
23:05 Re: Early console attach vs PCI_NETBSD_CONFIGURE (1) Michael
20:10 Early console attach vs PCI_NETBSD_CONFIGURE (1) Gavan Fantom
17:27 Re: factoring out the change_root() and making exp (0) David Holland
15:05 Re: on getting rid of KAUTH_GENERIC_ISSUSER (0) Elad Efrat
13:24 Re: factoring out the change_root() and making exp (0) Christoph Badura
13:16 Re: factoring out the change_root() and making exp (0) Christoph Badura
12:42 Re: on getting rid of KAUTH_GENERIC_ISSUSER (1) Christoph Badura
12:37 Re: factoring out prop_XXX_pack_pref() and prop_XX (1) Christoph Badura
12:03 Re: factoring out the change_root() and making exp (1) Christoph Badura


Page 1 of 2009/08
[Prev Page] [Newest Page] [Oldest Page] [Next Page]
Home


Mail converted by MHonArc