Time | Subject | # followups | From |
Tue, 11 Aug 2009 |
06:45 |
Re: UVM typedef struct |
(2) |
David Holland |
06:44 |
Re: UVM typedef struct |
(0) |
David Laight |
06:38 |
Re: UVM typedef struct |
(0) |
David Holland |
06:30 |
Re: vfs-level naming issue |
(0) |
David Holland |
00:48 |
Re: UVM typedef struct |
(0) |
Jason Thorpe |
00:43 |
Re: UVM typedef struct |
(3) |
Jason Thorpe |
00:41 |
Re: UVM typedef struct |
(1) |
Jason Thorpe |
00:40 |
Re: UVM typedef struct |
(0) |
Jason Thorpe |
Mon, 10 Aug 2009 |
21:16 |
Re: Early console attach vs PCI_NETBSD_CONFIGURE |
(0) |
Gavan Fantom |
17:42 |
Re: vfs-level naming issue |
(1) |
Adam Hamsik |
16:08 |
vfs-level naming issue |
(1) |
David Holland |
15:23 |
Re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives - |
(0) |
David Young |
15:09 |
re: swap space leak in 5.0_STABLE |
(0) |
matthew green |
15:02 |
Re: swap space leak in 5.0_STABLE |
(1) |
Manuel Bouyer |
14:43 |
Re: swap space leak in 5.0_STABLE |
(1) |
YAMAMOTO Takashi |
14:25 |
Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical |
(0) |
Marc Balmer |
13:34 |
Re: swap space leak in 5.0_STABLE |
(0) |
Mark Davies |
13:25 |
Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical |
(1) |
Manuel Bouyer |
13:23 |
Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO re |
(0) |
Joerg Sonnenberger |
13:14 |
Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO re |
(1) |
Manuel Bouyer |
13:08 |
Re: swap space leak in 5.0_STABLE |
(3) |
Manuel Bouyer |
12:53 |
Re: swap space leak in 5.0_STABLE |
(2) |
Mark Davies |
10:13 |
Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO re |
(1) |
Marc Balmer |
07:48 |
Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO re |
(1) |
Thor Lancelot Simon |
07:41 |
Re: Reworked: Support for multi-position electro-m |
(0) |
Marc Balmer |
06:56 |
Re: what keylock(4) actually does for netbsd? |
(0) |
Marc Balmer |
06:11 |
Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical |
(1) |
Marc Balmer |
Sun, 09 Aug 2009 |
22:18 |
re: swap space leak in 5.0_STABLE |
(1) |
matthew green |
21:54 |
Re: swap space leak in 5.0_STABLE |
(1) |
Mark Davies |
21:37 |
re: swap space leak in 5.0_STABLE |
(0) |
matthew green |
21:18 |
Re: swap space leak in 5.0_STABLE |
(2) |
Matthew Mondor |
21:12 |
Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO re |
(0) |
Tonnerre LOMBARD |
21:05 |
re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives - |
(1) |
matthew green |
20:55 |
Re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives - |
(0) |
Manuel Bouyer |
20:54 |
Re: sata tape drives? |
(0) |
Paul Goyette |
20:53 |
Re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives - |
(0) |
Paul Goyette |
20:53 |
Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO re |
(2) |
Marc Balmer |
20:48 |
Re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives - |
(2) |
David Laight |
20:40 |
Re: [PATCH] pcictl: simplify its usage |
(0) |
Manuel Bouyer |
20:37 |
Re: sata tape drives? |
(1) |
Manuel Bouyer |
20:35 |
Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO re |
(0) |
Christos Zoulas |
20:30 |
re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives - |
(1) |
matthew green |
20:28 |
Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical |
(0) |
Marc Balmer |
20:24 |
Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical |
(1) |
Paul Goyette |
20:23 |
Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical |
(1) |
Matt Thomas |
20:20 |
Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical |
(1) |
Marc Balmer |
20:17 |
re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical |
(1) |
matthew green |
20:06 |
Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical |
(2) |
Marc Balmer |
20:05 |
re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical |
(1) |
matthew green |
20:02 |
Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical |
(1) |
Marc Balmer |
20:00 |
Re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives - |
(0) |
Manuel Bouyer |
19:59 |
Re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives - |
(0) |
Paul Goyette |
19:56 |
Re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives - |
(0) |
Manuel Bouyer |
19:50 |
re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical |
(1) |
matthew green |
19:47 |
Re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives - |
(3) |
Manuel Bouyer |
19:38 |
Re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives - |
(1) |
Manuel Bouyer |
19:38 |
Re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives - |
(2) |
David Laight |
19:35 |
Re: sata tape drives? |
(1) |
Manuel Bouyer |
19:34 |
re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives - |
(0) |
Paul Goyette |
19:30 |
Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO re |
(0) |
David Laight |
19:29 |
re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives - |
(2) |
matthew green |
19:14 |
Re: Reworked: Support for multi-position electro-m |
(0) |
Marc Balmer |
19:00 |
Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO re |
(0) |
Marc Balmer |
19:00 |
Re: sata tape drives? |
(0) |
Paul Goyette |
18:56 |
Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO re |
(1) |
Matt Thomas |
18:55 |
sata tape drives? |
(2) |
Bernd Ernesti |
18:52 |
Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO re |
(1) |
Manuel Bouyer |
18:40 |
Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO re |
(0) |
Marc Balmer |
18:38 |
Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO re |
(2) |
Marc Balmer |
18:36 |
Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO re |
(1) |
Ted Lemon |
18:35 |
Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO re |
(1) |
Manuel Bouyer |
18:25 |
Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO re |
(2) |
Marc Balmer |
18:19 |
Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO re |
(0) |
Marc Balmer |
17:40 |
Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO re |
(1) |
Ted Lemon |
17:34 |
Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO re |
(2) |
Adam Hoka |
17:34 |
Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO re |
(1) |
Marc Balmer |
17:32 |
Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO re |
(1) |
Matt Thomas |
17:13 |
Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO re |
(1) |
Marc Balmer |
17:11 |
Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO re |
(1) |
Adam Hoka |
17:03 |
Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO re |
(2) |
Marc Balmer |
15:58 |
Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO re |
(0) |
Thor Lancelot Simon |
15:41 |
Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO re |
(2) |
Marc Balmer |
15:35 |
Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO re |
(1) |
Thor Lancelot Simon |
15:30 |
Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO re |
(2) |
YAMAMOTO Takashi |
14:18 |
Re: gpioiic(4), I2C bus over GPIO bit-banging |
(0) |
Marc Balmer |
14:04 |
Re: gpioiic(4), I2C bus over GPIO bit-banging |
(1) |
Matthias Scheler |
13:25 |
swap space leak in 5.0_STABLE |
(2) |
Mark Davies |
12:55 |
Re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives - |
(0) |
Paul Goyette |
12:45 |
Re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives - |
(0) |
Paul Goyette |
12:22 |
Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO re |
(0) |
Marc Balmer |
12:04 |
Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO re |
(2) |
Adam Hamsik |
11:39 |
Re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives - |
(0) |
Manuel Bouyer |
11:36 |
Re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives - |
(3) |
Manuel Bouyer |
10:59 |
Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO re |
(2) |
Marc Balmer |
10:14 |
Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical |
(0) |
Marc Balmer |
10:01 |
Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical |
(1) |
Marc Balmer |
08:28 |
Re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives - |
(2) |
Iain Hibbert |
03:01 |
Re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives - |
(2) |
Paul Goyette |
Sat, 08 Aug 2009 |
22:45 |
Re: gpioiic(4), I2C bus over GPIO bit-banging |
(0) |
Tonnerre LOMBARD |
22:44 |
Re: gpioiic(4), I2C bus over GPIO bit-banging |
(0) |
Tonnerre LOMBARD |
18:28 |
Re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives |
(1) |
Paul Goyette |
18:23 |
Re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives |
(0) |
Paul Goyette |
17:51 |
Re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives |
(0) |
David Young |
17:49 |
Re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives |
(2) |
David Young |
16:14 |
Re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives |
(1) |
Paul Goyette |
14:07 |
Re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives |
(1) |
Marc Balmer |
14:02 |
Re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives |
(1) |
Paul Goyette |
13:39 |
Re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives |
(1) |
Marc Balmer |
13:33 |
Re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives |
(1) |
Paul Goyette |
13:33 |
Re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives |
(1) |
Paul Goyette |
13:12 |
Re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives |
(1) |
Marc Balmer |
12:36 |
Re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives |
(1) |
Marc Balmer |
12:36 |
Re: gpioiic(4), I2C bus over GPIO bit-banging |
(3) |
Marc Balmer |
12:28 |
Re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives |
(2) |
Paul Goyette |
12:16 |
Re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives |
(1) |
Marc Balmer |
12:10 |
Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives |
(1) |
Paul Goyette |
10:37 |
gpioiic(4), I2C bus over GPIO bit-banging |
(1) |
Marc Balmer |
09:14 |
Re: [HEADS UP] zfs import |
(0) |
Pawel Jakub Dawidek |
07:44 |
CDDL [was: ]Re: [HEADS UP] zfs import |
(0) |
Hubert Feyrer |
06:26 |
Re: [HEADS UP] zfs import |
(0) |
Adam Hamsik |
01:28 |
Re: [HEADS UP] zfs import |
(0) |
Thor Lancelot Simon |
Fri, 07 Aug 2009 |
23:38 |
Re: [HEADS UP] zfs import |
(3) |
Arnaud Lacombe |
21:11 |
[HEADS UP] zfs import |
(2) |
Adam Hamsik |
18:28 |
Re: on getting rid of KAUTH_GENERIC_ISSUSER |
(0) |
Elad Efrat |
18:28 |
Re: RAIDframe parity logging |
(0) |
Thor Lancelot Simon |
18:28 |
RAIDframe parity logging |
(1) |
Thor Lancelot Simon |
18:28 |
Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical |
(0) |
Peter Seebach |
09:41 |
Lona |
(0) |
MR ALONSO FERNANDO |
08:14 |
Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical |
(1) |
Marc Balmer |
Thu, 06 Aug 2009 |
16:06 |
Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical |
(0) |
Peter Seebach |
15:54 |
Re: Problems with hangs under NetBSD-5.x |
(0) |
Manuel Bouyer |
15:42 |
Re: Problems with hangs under NetBSD-5.x |
(1) |
Mindaugas Rasiukevicius |
15:28 |
Re: Problems with hangs under NetBSD-5.x |
(0) |
Mindaugas Rasiukevicius |
14:50 |
Re: Problems with hangs under NetBSD-5.x |
(0) |
Greg Oster |
14:22 |
Re: Problems with hangs under NetBSD-5.x |
(0) |
Manuel Bouyer |
14:17 |
Re: Problems with hangs under NetBSD-5.x |
(1) |
Manuel Bouyer |
13:38 |
Re: Reworked: Support for multi-position electro-m |
(0) |
Marc Balmer |
10:51 |
Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical |
(0) |
Marc Balmer |
10:47 |
Re: the __ namespace in the kernel |
(0) |
Antti Kantee |
10:47 |
Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical |
(1) |
Anders Magnusson |
10:42 |
Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical |
(0) |
Marc Balmer |
10:42 |
Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical |
(0) |
Antti Kantee |
10:41 |
Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical |
(2) |
Marc Balmer |
10:37 |
Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical |
(1) |
Marc Balmer |
10:34 |
Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical |
(3) |
Matthias Drochner |
08:00 |
Reworked: Support for multi-position electro-mecha |
(4) |
Marc Balmer |
07:21 |
Re: factoring out prop_XXX_pack_pref() and prop_XX |
(0) |
Iain Hibbert |
07:19 |
Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical |
(1) |
Marc Balmer |
Wed, 05 Aug 2009 |
22:15 |
Re: factoring out prop_XXX_pack_pref() and prop_XX |
(1) |
Christoph Badura |
06:44 |
Re: factoring out prop_XXX_pack_pref() and prop_XX |
(0) |
David Laight |
06:14 |
Re: Problems with hangs under NetBSD-5.x |
(3) |
Brian Buhrow |
02:55 |
Re: factoring out prop_XXX_pack_pref() and prop_XX |
(0) |
David Holland |
00:28 |
Re: factoring out prop_XXX_pack_pref() and prop_XX |
(3) |
Jason Thorpe |
Tue, 04 Aug 2009 |
22:07 |
Re: Problems with hangs under NetBSD-5.x |
(1) |
Mark Davies |
21:07 |
Re: [PATCH] pcictl: simplify its usage |
(1) |
Matthias Drochner |
17:39 |
Re: Fwd: usb driver programming |
(0) |
Iain Hibbert |
16:45 |
Re: Fwd: usb driver programming |
(1) |
Dmitry Cherkassov |
10:13 |
Re: Fwd: usb driver programming |
(1) |
Iain Hibbert |
09:35 |
Fwd: usb driver programming |
(1) |
Dmitry Cherkassov |
03:19 |
Re: Vnode scope implementation |
(1) |
Elad Efrat |
Mon, 03 Aug 2009 |
23:07 |
Re: Vnode scope implementation |
(1) |
YAMAMOTO Takashi |
16:04 |
Re: kernel_lock, splbio() and SMP_SAFE |
(0) |
Manuel Bouyer |
15:58 |
Re: kernel_lock, splbio() and SMP_SAFE |
(0) |
Mindaugas Rasiukevicius |
15:58 |
Re: kernel_lock, splbio() and SMP_SAFE |
(1) |
Manuel Bouyer |
15:37 |
Re: kernel_lock, splbio() and SMP_SAFE |
(1) |
Mindaugas Rasiukevicius |
15:28 |
Re: kernel_lock, splbio() and SMP_SAFE |
(1) |
Manuel Bouyer |
14:58 |
Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical |
(2) |
Peter Seebach |
14:44 |
Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical |
(1) |
Marc Balmer |
14:23 |
Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical |
(1) |
David Holland |
11:38 |
kernel_lock, splbio() and SMP_SAFE |
(2) |
Manuel Bouyer |
03:45 |
Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical |
(1) |
David Holland |
Sun, 02 Aug 2009 |
19:48 |
Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical |
(0) |
Marc Balmer |
19:44 |
Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical |
(0) |
Christoph Badura |
19:43 |
Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical |
(1) |
Arnaud Lacombe |
19:06 |
Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical |
(0) |
Marc Balmer |
19:03 |
Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical |
(2) |
Antti Kantee |
18:53 |
Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical |
(2) |
Marc Balmer |
18:26 |
Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical |
(1) |
Mindaugas Rasiukevicius |
17:46 |
Re: on getting rid of KAUTH_GENERIC_ISSUSER |
(1) |
Iain Hibbert |
17:23 |
Re: Problems with hangs under NetBSD-5.x |
(0) |
Manuel Bouyer |
16:52 |
Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical |
(0) |
Hubert Feyrer |
16:45 |
Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical |
(1) |
Arnaud Lacombe |
16:35 |
Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical |
(1) |
Christoph Badura |
14:08 |
Re: roadmap for /kern |
(0) |
Tonnerre LOMBARD |
09:54 |
Support for multi-position electro-mechanical keyl |
(6) |
Marc Balmer |
08:27 |
Re: roadmap for /kern |
(0) |
Marc Balmer |
05:50 |
Re: roadmap for /kern |
(0) |
David Holland |
05:35 |
Re: roadmap for /kern |
(2) |
Matthew Mondor |
04:14 |
Re: roadmap for /kern |
(1) |
Arnaud Lacombe |
02:09 |
roadmap for /kern |
(2) |
matthew sporleder |
Sat, 01 Aug 2009 |
23:31 |
Re: Problems with hangs under NetBSD-5.x |
(1) |
Matthew Mondor |
23:05 |
Re: Early console attach vs PCI_NETBSD_CONFIGURE |
(1) |
Michael |
20:10 |
Early console attach vs PCI_NETBSD_CONFIGURE |
(1) |
Gavan Fantom |
17:27 |
Re: factoring out the change_root() and making exp |
(0) |
David Holland |
15:05 |
Re: on getting rid of KAUTH_GENERIC_ISSUSER |
(0) |
Elad Efrat |
13:24 |
Re: factoring out the change_root() and making exp |
(0) |
Christoph Badura |
13:16 |
Re: factoring out the change_root() and making exp |
(0) |
Christoph Badura |
12:42 |
Re: on getting rid of KAUTH_GENERIC_ISSUSER |
(1) |
Christoph Badura |
12:37 |
Re: factoring out prop_XXX_pack_pref() and prop_XX |
(1) |
Christoph Badura |
12:03 |
Re: factoring out the change_root() and making exp |
(1) |
Christoph Badura |