Re: WG LAST CALL: SECSH Public Key File Format

[nisse%lysator.liu.se@localhost (Niels Möller)]

Derek Fawcus <dfawcus%cisco.com@localhost> writes:

> > Discussion question for the working group: Should this be advanced as
> > Informational or as a Standards Track document?  It could go either
> > way -- it's not a "wire protocol" per se but it does describe a blob
> > of data which can be exchanged (out of band) between implementations.
> 
> I'd say Informational.

Me two. Actually, I'll most likely prefer *not* using this format, but
to stay with the keyformats defined by SPKI.

/Niels