IETF-SSH archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: [psg.com #460] IESG - Transport - Oakley
Jeffrey Hutzelman wrote:
> I still believe that recommending DH-GEX in the core document is better
> than doing so only in the DH-GEX document. People can claim to implement
> ssh without having ever _read_ the DH-GEX document.
Well, DH-GEX seems to need a little more work than the core docs and it
has not received as much scrutiny. If mentioning a document that will
not likely be published until well after the core docs is deemed
acceptable, then we don't oppose it.
> Other than that, I'm inclined to agree. We should adopt the groupNN
> convention informally, but making it a formal parameter seems to invite
> implementors to interpret other names the same way.
>
> At this point I don't think we have any disagreement that
> - we should specify diffie-hellman-group14-sha1
> - it should be at least RECOMMENDED (I prefer REQUIRED; who objects?)
> - we should not specify other hashes at this time
Agree.
-d
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index