Re: draft-harris-ssh-arcfour-fixes-02.txt: should this be a secsh draft

[Ben Harris <bjh21%bjh21.me.uk@localhost>]

In article <tslvf5s14ux.fsf%cz.mit.edu@localhost> you write:
>The IESG has received a request to publish
>draft-harris-ssh-arcfour-fixes-02 as a proposed standard.  I'm aware
>that this draft has been discussed by participants in the secsh
>working group.
>
>Does the secsh working group wish to adopt this draft as a work item
>or shall I proceed with this draft as an individual submission?

Last time this was mentioned (in March, ISTR), there was no comment on
Bill Sommerfeld's suggestion that it be sent to the IESG as an individual
submission.  I don't know about anyone else, but I couldn't see any
great advantage to turning it into a WG document, so I submitted it
individually.

-- 
Ben Harris