Re: draft-harris-ssh-arcfour-fixes-02.txt: should this be a secsh draft

[Joseph Galbraith <galb-list%vandyke.com@localhost>]

Ben Harris wrote:
> In article <tslvf5s14ux.fsf%cz.mit.edu@localhost> you write:
>
> > The IESG has received a request to publish
> > draft-harris-ssh-arcfour-fixes-02 as a proposed standard.  I'm aware
> > that this draft has been discussed by participants in the secsh
> > working group.
> >
> > Does the secsh working group wish to adopt this draft as a work item
> > or shall I proceed with this draft as an individual submission?
>
>
> Last time this was mentioned (in March, ISTR), there was no comment on
> Bill Sommerfeld's suggestion that it be sent to the IESG as an individual
> submission.  I don't know about anyone else, but I couldn't see any
> great advantage to turning it into a WG document, so I submitted it
> individually.

Just so this doesn't happen out of sheer apathy...

What advantage would there be to the working group
taking this on as opposed to it proceeding as an
individual submission?

Thanks,

Joseph