Re: draft-harris-ssh-arcfour-fixes-02.txt: should this be a secsh draft

[Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf%mit.edu@localhost>]

>>>>> "Ben" == Ben Harris <bjh21%bjh21.me.uk@localhost> writes:

    Ben> In article <tslvf5s14ux.fsf%cz.mit.edu@localhost> you write:
    >> The IESG has received a request to publish
    >> draft-harris-ssh-arcfour-fixes-02 as a proposed standard.  I'm
    >> aware that this draft has been discussed by participants in the
    >> secsh working group.
    >> 
    >> Does the secsh working group wish to adopt this draft as a work
    >> item or shall I proceed with this draft as an individual
    >> submission?

    Ben> Last time this was mentioned (in March, ISTR), there was no
    Ben> comment on Bill Sommerfeld's suggestion that it be sent to
    Ben> the IESG as an individual submission.  I don't know about
    Ben> anyone else, but I couldn't see any great advantage to
    Ben> turning it into a WG document, so I submitted it
    Ben> individually.

I think handling it as an individual submission is fine, but the
working group effectively gets right of first refusal.