Re: print/ghostscript - "cups" option shouldn't be default?

["Malcolm Herbert" <mjch%mjch.net@localhost>]

On Thu, 19 May 2011 20:47 -0300, "Silas Silva" <silasdb%gmail.com@localhost>
wrote:
> It looks that enabling cups support creates just seven more files (among
> hundreds default files), so why not just let it default?

as long as enabling CUPS support doesn't preclude packages from Just
Working with the default system lpr then I'd be happy.  I've never
gotten CUPS to work reliably, but have had no issues at all with the
system lpr.

Regards,
Malcolm
 

-- 
Malcolm Herbert                                This brain intentionally
mjch%mjch.net@localhost                                                left 
blank