pkgsrc-Users archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: print/ghostscript - "cups" option shouldn't be default?

To: pkgsrc-users%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: Re: print/ghostscript - "cups" option shouldn't be default?
From: Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost>
Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 12:52:16 +0200

On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 08:47:57PM -0300, Silas Silva wrote:
> It looks that enabling cups support creates just seven more files (among
> hundreds default files), so why not just let it default?

At least in the past, it created a cyclic dependency with Ghostscript
with CUPS option.

Joerg

Follow-Ups:
- Re: print/ghostscript - "cups" option shouldn't be default?
  - From: Rhialto

References:
- print/ghostscript - "cups" option shouldn't be default?
  - From: Silas Silva

Prev by Date: Build fails for net/rtorrent, pkgtools/pkgdep
Next by Date: Re: non-DESTDIR status: 97 to go
Previous by Thread: Re: print/ghostscript - "cups" option shouldn't be default?
Next by Thread: Re: print/ghostscript - "cups" option shouldn't be default?
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index