IETF-SSH archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Transport I-D: KEXINIT reserved field needs description
The transport I-D defines the SSH_MSG_KEXINIT message:
byte SSH_MSG_KEXINIT
byte[16] cookie (random bytes)
string kex_algorithms
string server_host_key_algorithms
string encryption_algorithms_client_to_server
string encryption_algorithms_server_to_client
string mac_algorithms_client_to_server
string mac_algorithms_server_to_client
string compression_algorithms_client_to_server
string compression_algorithms_server_to_client
string languages_client_to_server
string languages_server_to_client
boolean first_kex_packet_follows
uint32 0 (reserved for future extension)
Nothing is said about the semantics of the last field.
Can implementors describe how they handle non-zero values for the last
field of SSH_MSG_KEXINIT?
I propose the following change:
- Name the last field of KEXINIT "extensions":
byte SSH_MSG_KEXINIT
byte[16] cookie (random bytes)
string kex_algorithms
string server_host_key_algorithms
string encryption_algorithms_client_to_server
string encryption_algorithms_server_to_client
string mac_algorithms_client_to_server
string mac_algorithms_server_to_client
string compression_algorithms_client_to_server
string compression_algorithms_server_to_client
string languages_client_to_server
string languages_server_to_client
boolean first_kex_packet_follows
uint32 extensions
- Describe the 'extensions' field and the semantics of extensions
negotiation:
extensions
Currently MUST always be set to zero (0). If set to zero this
is the last item in this packet. Future extensions to
SSH_MSG_KEXINIT may be defined by IETF RFCs which specify
non-zero values for this field and add fields to the end of the
packet. Receipients MUST ignore any items in SSH_MSG_KEXINIT
packets past this field that if they do not know the extensions
value.
["Implementations must be careful to include the entire
SSH_MSG_KEXINIT packets in the session ID hash, not just the
fields they know about." ??]
Cheers,
Nico
--
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index